Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13111575 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ratka Čolić (0000-0002-2600-6668, University of Belgrade, corresponding author), Đorđe Milić (Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia), Jasna Petrić (0000-0003-1364-9549, Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia), Nataša Čolić (0000-0002-6065-5143, Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 69-89 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning C Politics and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2399-6544 • E-ISSN: 2399-6552 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23996544211002188 |
| OpenAlex | W3138521085 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 24 |
In 2019, Serbia adopted its first national urban policy. This document was established through a communicative process during 2018–2019, formally encouraging urban governance as a practical innovation in Serbia’s planning doctrine. The main aim of this research is to explore institutional capacity development within a live setting of the policy formation process. The participants of this process are the primary subjects of the research. Data was collected through participatory events in four instances during the process. The concept of institutional capacity development is used in this paper as a basic framework to assess knowledge, relational and mobilisation capacity for urban governance. The main contribution of this paper is providing an understanding of the challenges and potentials for establishing urban governance practices in a post-socialist country planning context. Findings indicate an increase in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of governance instruments such that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The identified challenges relate to the mobilisation capacity and fragility of institutions and resistance to change, while a need to deal with complexity and uncertainty remains present
Business · Citizen journalism · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Geography · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Urban planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Urban Planning and Governance
To what extent can collaborative platforms in urban planning education enhance transformative learning outside of academia
Beyond Conventional Gender Classification
Europeanisation of spatial planning. The Western Balkans between innovation and resistance
The soft underbelly of complexity science adoption in policymaking
Electoral dynamics, the construction of a common sense and national urban policies
Transforming governance
Collaborative policymaking
Null
Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development
Making Better Places
Scales of participation and multi-scalar citizenship in EU participatory governance
Territory, Politics, Governance and Multispatial Metagovernance
Evaluation in the Field
Evaluation of Public Participation
Creativity and urban governance
Entrepreneurial Governance
What Is Governance
Understanding Governance
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |