How to Handle Humility? Audaciously
A Response to Mark Tschaepe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13123747 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tibor Solymosi (0000-0001-9393-116X, Allegheny College, corresponding author), Bill Bywater (Allegheny College) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 145-159 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Eidos A Journal for Philosophy of Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2544-302X • E-ISSN: 2544-302X |
| Publisher | University of Warsaw (PUBLISHER • PL) |
| DOI | 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0035 |
| OpenAlex | W2982231461 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
We address Mark Tschaepe's response to Tibor Solymosi, in which Tschaepe argues that neuropragmatism needs to be coupled with humility in order to redress "dopamine democracy," Tschaepe's term for our contemporary situation of smartphone addiction that undermines democracy. We reject Tschaepe's distinction between humility and fallibility, arguing that audacious fallibility is all we need. We take the opportunity presented by Tschaepe's constructive criticism of neuropragmatism to reassert some central themes of neuropragmatism. We close with discussion of Bywater's method of apprenticeship, as an imaginative education for creative democracy, thereby rejecting Tschaepe's claim that neuropragmatism lacks a pedagogical method
Humility · Theology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |