Framing analysis of Japan and China's response to Fukushima water discharge
Technical rationality vs local experience
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13129147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Congrong Sun (Beijing Normal University), Chenxi Sun (0000-0003-3421-4587), Qingliu Ren (Beijing Normal University), Xiaolin Liu (0000-0002-6909-117X, Beijing Normal University), Yuejing Ge (Beijing Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Pages | 100313-100313 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Earth System Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2589-8116 • E-ISSN: 2589-8116 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.esg.2026.100313 |
| OpenAlex | W7125955760 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 54 |
This study examines how China and Japan competed to frame the Fukushima water discharge while constructing domestic and international legitimacy. Using a functional framing model and frame-credibility dimensions, we compare strategies: Japan promoted a “Scientific Safety” frame to build technical legitimacy, bolstered by international authority endorsements; China advanced an “Environmental Justice” frame stressing historical accountability, ecological risk, and regional cultural resonance. The confrontation exposed tensions between technical rationality and lived local experience. Internationally, framing moved from a bilateral contest to a multi-level legitimacy struggle and edged toward a tentative, monitoring-based partial accommodation through emerging oversight mechanisms, while deeper conflicts over risk, justice and responsibility remained unresolved. The results enrich theory on framing, legitimacy, and risk governance, and offer practical guidance for bridging technical and cultural claims in global environmental disputes
China · CONTEST · Frame analysis · Framing (construction · Legitimacy · Rationality · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Risk Perception and Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Rethinking Geopolitics
Managing Legitimacy
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings
The power of the “weak” and international organizations
A comparative corpus-based news values analysis of Philippine, South Korean, Singapore and Chinese media reactions to Japan’s nuclear wastewater release
Perceptions of food safety, access to information, and political trust in China
Post-Fukushima discourse in the US press
Negotiating climate change
Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys
The conservation value of the Shinan Tidal Flat in Korea
Deficit Lay or Deficit Expert
Thoughts, perceptions and concerns of coastal residents regarding the discharge of tritium-containing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean
Epistemic justice impossible? Expert perceptions of the participatory monitoring of geo-energy projects in Poland
China's imaginary of ecological civilization
Access and allocation in earth system governance
What goes around, comes around? Access and allocation problems in Global North–South waste trade
All Hands on Deck”
Risk frames and multiple ways of knowing
International Crises of Legitimacy
Framing risk
Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea
Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance
Justice washing extractivism
Communicating Climate Change
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance
Framing
Opening Up" and "Closing Down
Careful knowing as an aspect of environmental justice
Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination
Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology
Framing Processes and Social Movements
Mismanaging Risk and the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |