Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Common sources of occupant dissatisfaction with workspace environments in 600 office buildings

Bibliographic Data

ID13132037
AuthorsThomas Parkinson (0000-0002-0088-8754, University of California, Berkeley), Stefano Schiavon (0000-0003-1285-5682, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author), Jungsoo Kim (0000-0003-1423-0862, The University of Sydney), Giovanni Betti (0000-0002-1185-9916, University of California, Berkeley)
Year2023
Volume4
Issue1
Pages17-35
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBuildings and Cities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2632-6655 • E-ISSN: 2632-6655
PublisherUbiquity Press, Ltd. (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5334/bc.274
OpenAlexW4313579264
LanguageEN
References cited52

Previously unpublished data from over 600 office buildings in the Center for the Built Environment (CBE) Occupant Survey database are used to perform a systematic analysis of dissatisfaction in contemporary workspaces. A total of 81% of respondents expressed dissatisfaction with at least one aspect of their workspace, and 67% with more than one. Acoustics were the most common source of dissatisfaction, particularly related to people talking, speech privacy, and phones. Other challenges included a perceived lack of control over the temperature and insufficient space, along with other associated problems of densely populated offices. The analysis shows that context matters when understanding occupant dissatisfaction. Occupants of open-plan offices with low or no partitions were almost twice as likely to complain about their workspace than someone in a private, enclosed office. Being near a window decreased the likelihood of dissatisfaction compared with those who were not near a window. There was a clear relationship between self-perceived performance and satisfaction with the indoor environment. Dissatisfaction profiles found that acoustics, space, and privacy-related items co-occur for many occupants dissatisfied with more than one workspace aspect. Practical relevance Post-occupancy surveys are a useful tool for evaluating whether an office environment supports occupants while conducting their work. While highlighting the successes is important, complaints from dissatisfied occupants can identify issues and pinpoint reasons why spaces do not meet expectations. The reported challenges generally relate to the simultaneous reduction in control and personalization with increasingly open and densely populated layouts. Occupant dissatisfaction may impact performance given the reported relationship between satisfaction with the environment and feeling supported by the workspace to complete work tasks. The themes emerging from this analysis identify common dissatisfaction sources that can serve as an empirical basis to identify common problems in contemporary workspace designs

Architectural engineering · Civil engineering · Context (archaeology · Control (management · Geography · Open plan · Personalization · Political science · Post-occupancy evaluation · Relevance (law · Workspace · World Wide Web · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Computer Science · Engineering · Facilities and Workplace Management · Noise Effects and Management · Psychology

  • How can airborne transmission of Covid-19 indoors be minimised?

    Open Access•Lidia Morawska, Julian W Tang et al.•Environment International•2020

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • Silhouettes

    Open Access•Peter J Rousseeuw•Journal of Computational and…•1987

  • Lessons learned from 20 years of CBE’s occupant surveys

    Open Access•Lindsay T Graham, Thomas Parkinson et al.•Buildings and Cities•2021

  • The Workplace Window View

    Lene Lottrup, Ulrika K Stigsdotter et al.•Landscape Research•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae