Transitioning from interviewer-administered to self-administered survey modes
Implications for the quality of political measures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13137406 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nursel Alkoç (0009-0008-8064-9497, University of Lausanne, corresponding author), Michèle Ernst Stähli (0000-0002-1217-2470, FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2025.1425888 |
| OpenAlex | W4413181242 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 20 |
Face-to-face surveys have traditionally been regarded as the “gold standard” in data collection. However, due to declining response rates and soaring costs, they have largely been replaced by self-administered methods. This trend has been further accelerated by the COVID pandemic, which has driven even major scientific surveys to adopt self-completion modes. Using evidence from the Swiss European Social Survey (ESS) and the Measurement and Observation of Social Attitudes in Switzerland (MOSAiCH)—the former intending the transition and the latter having already done it, this paper examines the implications of the transition from face-to-face interviews to self-completion questionnaires for the quality of political measures, which are the most frequently used by scholars. We draw our analyses upon telephone, web, and mail questionnaires of the LIVES-FORS mixed mode experiment and to-face interviews of the ESS 2012. The results do not show large mode differences in favor of face-to-face interviews in terms of political measures. On the contrary, telephone, web and paper modes may offer more advantages in certain situations. To better understand the implications of the intended mode transition in ESS, additional analyses were conducted with MOSAiCH, which has the same quality standards as ESS and switched from a face-to-face survey to a self-survey mode already in 2018. The findings suggest that a shift to self-administered questionnaires could provide political estimates that are of similar quality as those from face-to-face interviews
Epistemology · Interview · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Mail and telephone surveys
Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality
Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective
Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys
The European Values Study 2017
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires
The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior
Does survey mode matter for studying electoral behaviour? Evidence from the 2009 German Longitudinal Election Study
Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |