Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Misconceived

Why These Further Criticisms of Anti-natalism Fail

Bibliographic Data

ID13599368
AuthorsDavid Benatar (0000-0003-3115-9172, University of Cape Town, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume56
Issue1
Pages119-151
Publication date2022-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Value Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5363 • E-ISSN: 1573-0492
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s10790-022-09890-w
OpenAlexW4220847778
LanguageEN
Citations received5

Economics · Epistemology · Positive economics · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Unfeigning the delusion

    Open Access•Robbert Zandbergen•Philosophy Compass•2022

  • Against Adoption‐Based Objections to Procreation

    Open Access•Hill•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2024

  • The Wrong Inference to the Best Explanation for Anti-Natalism

    Open Access•Fumitake Yoshizawa•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2025

  • Better Never to Have Been, Better to Cease to Be

    Open Access•C J Leak, Connor Leak•Utilitas•2026

  • What if God was all of us? Why the definition of ‘God’ matters in analytic discussions of meaning in life

    Open Access•Asheel Singh•Religious Studies•2025

Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae