Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Benatar

Biographic Data

ID4492468
NAMEDavid Benatar
GIVEN NAMESDavid
FAMILY NAMEBenatar
SIGNATUREBENATAR D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cape Town
ORCID0000-0003-3115-9172
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS27
TOTAL CITATIONS72
WORKS AS AUTHOR27
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1998
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • Religious antinatalism

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•2026

    This article examines the relationship between religion and antinatalism – the view that it is wrong to create new sentient beings. Many people reject antinatalism on religious grounds. In this paper, I respond to such a rejection. First, I argue that antinatalism is not logically incompatible with theism. Second, I consider the pronatalist features of some religious traditions – those of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. These include …

  • Sentience and Why It Matters

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2025

    In this article, it is argued that in the actual world, even if not in all possible worlds, sentience is both a necessary and sufficient condition for having moral standing. In arguing for this conclusion, the concepts of sentience and moral standing are explained. Five kinds of interest are then differentiated—functional, biotic, sentient, sapient, and self-conscious. It is argued that having sentient interests, rather than merely any interests,…

  • Ethically defensible executions? A reply to Daniel Rodger and coauthors

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The Paradox of Desert

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

    This article describes a paradoxical phenomenon arising from the fact that those who act rightly often pay a price for doing so. The paradox is that the very thing – acting rightly – that incurs the cost also makes the cost (especially) undeserved. In explicating the paradox, I distinguish between two kinds of cost (internal and external), two kinds of unfairness (intrinsic and comparative), and two manifestations of the paradox (prospective and …

  • Misconceived

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2022

  • Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics

    Jessica du Toit, David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

    Sara Kolmes has argued that the human ‘handlers’ of emotional support animals (ESAs) should have the sorts of body-like rights to those animals that people with prosthetics have to their prosthetics. In support of this conclusion, she argues that ESAs both function and feel like prosthetics, and that the disanalogies between ESAs and prosthetics are irrelevant to whether humans can have body-like rights to their ESAs. In response, we argue that M…

  • Famine, Affluence, and Procreation

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Obscurity, falsehood, and innuendo – A response to M. John Lamola

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2018

    In a paper on a “contextual South African philosophy curriculum”, M. John Lamola makes some sweeping comments about South African philosophers during the apartheid era and insinuates parallels with those today who ask questions about what a decolonised curriculum is. His arguments here are unclear, are based on false and insufficiently nuanced claims, and are pregnant with innuendo. In my response I demonstrate this

  • The Human Predicament

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    The Human Predicament engages life’s big questions. Are our lives meaningless? Is death bad? Would immortality be better? Alternatively, should we hasten our deaths by acts of suicide? Many people are tempted to offer comforting, optimistic answers to these existential questions. The Human Predicament offers a less sanguine assessment and defends a substantial, but not unmitigated, pessimism. It is argued that while our lives can have some meanin…

  • Suicide

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    This chapter examines suicide as one response to the human predicament. It is argued that while suicide can bring relief from appalling quality of life, it is not a cost-free exit from the human predicament. Even when it is the least bad option, it nonetheless involves annihilation. Moreover, it fails to address the problem of meaninglessness at any level. Indeed, it often (even though not always) exacerbates that problem by limiting the sorts of…

  • Meaninglessness

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017•Cited by: 68

    This chapter is the second of two chapters concerned with whether life is meaningless. In this chapter, it is argued that life has no meaning sub specie aeternitatis (that is, no purpose or point from a cosmic perspective). Nihilism about cosmic meaning is the bad news. Some people deny that life lacks cosmic meaning while others argue that it does not matter that life lacks such meaning. The chapter responds to such arguments, some of which are …

  • The human predicament

    David Benatar, Maria Hernandez•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    Are our lives meaningful, or meaningless? Is our inevitable death a bad thing? Would immortaility be an improvement? Would it be better, all things considered, to hasten our death by suicide? Many people ask these big questions - and some people are plagued by them. Surprisingly, analytic philosophers have said relatively little about these important questions about the meaning of life. When they have tackled the big questions, they have tended, …

  • The Second Sexism

    Open Access•David Benatar•BOOK•Second Sexism•2012

  • How does anybody live in this strange place? A reply to Samantha Vice

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2012

    Samantha Vice has argued that ‘white’ South Africans are so tainted by the history of racial oppression in their country that they are incapable of attaining a great degree of moral virtue. She recommends that they should live in humility and political silence. There are a number of flaws in her argument. First, none of the characteristics of ‘white’ South Africans that she says provides the basis for these conclusions can distinguish (almost) al…

  • Every Conceivable Harm

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2012•Cited by: 3

    Many people are resistant to the conclusions for which I argued in Better Never to Have Been. I have previously responded to most of the published criticisms of my arguments. Here I respond to a new batch of critics (and to some fellow anti-natalists) who gathered for a conference at the University of Johannesburg and whose papers are published in this special issue of the South African Journal of Philosophy. I am also taking the opportunity to r…

  • The second sexism

    David Benatar•BOOK•Second Sexism•2012

  • Choosing Tomorrow’s Children

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2011

  • Procreation and Parenthood

    David Archard, David Benatar•BOOK•Procreation and parenthood•2010

    Producing and rearing children are immensely important human activities. This collection offers new and original essays by leading philosophers on some of the main ethical issues raised by these activities.

  • The Chickens Come Home to Roost

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    As the number of human deaths from avian influenza grows and as the disease spreads geographically, fears of a 21st century influenza epidemic or pandemic mount. Even if the disease does not reach epidemic proportions imminently, the fears are nonetheless well-founded. Inductive reasoning leads to the conclusion that an influenza epidemic will arise, as such epidemics have arisen many times before, including 3 times during the 20th century. The r…

  • Better Never to Have Been

    David Benatar•BOOK•Better Never to Have Been•2006

    This book argues for a number of related, highly provocative views: (i) coming into existence is always a serious harm; (ii) procreation is always wrong; (iii) it is wrong not to abort foetuses at the earlier stages of gestation; and (iv) it would be better if, as a result of there being no new people, humanity became extinct. Although these conclusions are antagonistic to common and deeply held intuitions, the book argues that these intuitions a…

  • Theoria Referees

    Open Access•Bruce Ackerman, Richard Aldrich et al.•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2006

  • The Trouble With Universal Declarations

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Developing World Bioethics•2005

    A number of problems plague universal declarations. To the extent that those drafting and adopting the declaration represent a range of different views, consensus can only be obtained if the declaration makes minimalist claims that all can support, or makes claims that are vague enough that they can be interpreted to everybody's satisfaction. To the extent that a universal declaration avoids these problems, and takes an unequivocal and controvers…

  • The Second Sexism, a Second Time

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2003

  • The Second Sexism

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2003

  • Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality

    David Benatar, Elliot N Dorff et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Religion•2002

    Editors' Introduction I. JEWISH ETHICS A. Literature and Context of 1. Menachem Kellner, The Structure of Ethics: B. Theoretical Issues in 1. Louis Newman, as Law, Law as Religion. 2. David Novak, Natural Law, Halakah, and the Covenant. 3. Harold Schluweid, The Single Mirror of Images. 4. Elliot Dorff, Covenant: Transcendent Thrust in Law: C. Reconceptualizing Ethics in Modern Times: 1. S. Daniel Breslauer, Modernizing American Liberal Dilemma. 2…

Next
  • Meaninglessness

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017•Cited by: 68

    This chapter is the second of two chapters concerned with whether life is meaningless. In this chapter, it is argued that life has no meaning sub specie aeternitatis (that is, no purpose or point from a cosmic perspective). Nihilism about cosmic meaning is the bad news. Some people deny that life lacks cosmic meaning while others argue that it does not matter that life lacks such meaning. The chapter responds to such arguments, some of which are …

  • Every Conceivable Harm

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2012•Cited by: 3

    Many people are resistant to the conclusions for which I argued in Better Never to Have Been. I have previously responded to most of the published criticisms of my arguments. Here I respond to a new batch of critics (and to some fellow anti-natalists) who gathered for a conference at the University of Johannesburg and whose papers are published in this special issue of the South African Journal of Philosophy. I am also taking the opportunity to r…

  • The Chickens Come Home to Roost

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    As the number of human deaths from avian influenza grows and as the disease spreads geographically, fears of a 21st century influenza epidemic or pandemic mount. Even if the disease does not reach epidemic proportions imminently, the fears are nonetheless well-founded. Inductive reasoning leads to the conclusion that an influenza epidemic will arise, as such epidemics have arisen many times before, including 3 times during the 20th century. The r…

  • Corporal Punishment

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•1998

  • Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality

    David Benatar, Elliot N Dorff et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Religion•2002

    Editors' Introduction I. JEWISH ETHICS A. Literature and Context of 1. Menachem Kellner, The Structure of Ethics: B. Theoretical Issues in 1. Louis Newman, as Law, Law as Religion. 2. David Novak, Natural Law, Halakah, and the Covenant. 3. Harold Schluweid, The Single Mirror of Images. 4. Elliot Dorff, Covenant: Transcendent Thrust in Law: C. Reconceptualizing Ethics in Modern Times: 1. S. Daniel Breslauer, Modernizing American Liberal Dilemma. 2…

  • Obligation, Motivation and Reward

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Religion•2002

    A Talmudic principle,' attributed to Rabbi Chanina, claims that a person who is commanded to perform an action and who obeys is greater than a person who is not so commanded but nonetheless acts in the way the commandment requires. Although the principle mentions only how people act, there is no reason to think that the principle does not apply equally to omissions-the subjects of negative commandments. Accordingly those who are commanded to refr…

  • The Second Sexism, a Second Time

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2003

  • The Second Sexism

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2003

  • The Trouble With Universal Declarations

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Developing World Bioethics•2005

    A number of problems plague universal declarations. To the extent that those drafting and adopting the declaration represent a range of different views, consensus can only be obtained if the declaration makes minimalist claims that all can support, or makes claims that are vague enough that they can be interpreted to everybody's satisfaction. To the extent that a universal declaration avoids these problems, and takes an unequivocal and controvers…

  • Better Never to Have Been

    David Benatar•BOOK•Better Never to Have Been•2006

    This book argues for a number of related, highly provocative views: (i) coming into existence is always a serious harm; (ii) procreation is always wrong; (iii) it is wrong not to abort foetuses at the earlier stages of gestation; and (iv) it would be better if, as a result of there being no new people, humanity became extinct. Although these conclusions are antagonistic to common and deeply held intuitions, the book argues that these intuitions a…

  • Theoria Referees

    Open Access•Bruce Ackerman, Richard Aldrich et al.•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2006

  • The Chickens Come Home to Roost

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•American Journal of Public Health•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    As the number of human deaths from avian influenza grows and as the disease spreads geographically, fears of a 21st century influenza epidemic or pandemic mount. Even if the disease does not reach epidemic proportions imminently, the fears are nonetheless well-founded. Inductive reasoning leads to the conclusion that an influenza epidemic will arise, as such epidemics have arisen many times before, including 3 times during the 20th century. The r…

  • Procreation and Parenthood

    David Archard, David Benatar•BOOK•Procreation and parenthood•2010

    Producing and rearing children are immensely important human activities. This collection offers new and original essays by leading philosophers on some of the main ethical issues raised by these activities.

  • Choosing Tomorrow’s Children

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2011

  • The Second Sexism

    Open Access•David Benatar•BOOK•Second Sexism•2012

  • How does anybody live in this strange place? A reply to Samantha Vice

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2012

    Samantha Vice has argued that ‘white’ South Africans are so tainted by the history of racial oppression in their country that they are incapable of attaining a great degree of moral virtue. She recommends that they should live in humility and political silence. There are a number of flaws in her argument. First, none of the characteristics of ‘white’ South Africans that she says provides the basis for these conclusions can distinguish (almost) al…

  • Every Conceivable Harm

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2012•Cited by: 3

    Many people are resistant to the conclusions for which I argued in Better Never to Have Been. I have previously responded to most of the published criticisms of my arguments. Here I respond to a new batch of critics (and to some fellow anti-natalists) who gathered for a conference at the University of Johannesburg and whose papers are published in this special issue of the South African Journal of Philosophy. I am also taking the opportunity to r…

  • The second sexism

    David Benatar•BOOK•Second Sexism•2012

  • The Human Predicament

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    The Human Predicament engages life’s big questions. Are our lives meaningless? Is death bad? Would immortality be better? Alternatively, should we hasten our deaths by acts of suicide? Many people are tempted to offer comforting, optimistic answers to these existential questions. The Human Predicament offers a less sanguine assessment and defends a substantial, but not unmitigated, pessimism. It is argued that while our lives can have some meanin…

  • Suicide

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    This chapter examines suicide as one response to the human predicament. It is argued that while suicide can bring relief from appalling quality of life, it is not a cost-free exit from the human predicament. Even when it is the least bad option, it nonetheless involves annihilation. Moreover, it fails to address the problem of meaninglessness at any level. Indeed, it often (even though not always) exacerbates that problem by limiting the sorts of…

  • Meaninglessness

    David Benatar•BOOK•The human predicament•2017•Cited by: 68

    This chapter is the second of two chapters concerned with whether life is meaningless. In this chapter, it is argued that life has no meaning sub specie aeternitatis (that is, no purpose or point from a cosmic perspective). Nihilism about cosmic meaning is the bad news. Some people deny that life lacks cosmic meaning while others argue that it does not matter that life lacks such meaning. The chapter responds to such arguments, some of which are …

  • The human predicament

    David Benatar, Maria Hernandez•BOOK•The human predicament•2017

    Are our lives meaningful, or meaningless? Is our inevitable death a bad thing? Would immortaility be an improvement? Would it be better, all things considered, to hasten our death by suicide? Many people ask these big questions - and some people are plagued by them. Surprisingly, analytic philosophers have said relatively little about these important questions about the meaning of life. When they have tackled the big questions, they have tended, …

  • Obscurity, falsehood, and innuendo – A response to M. John Lamola

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•South African Journal of Philosophy•2018

    In a paper on a “contextual South African philosophy curriculum”, M. John Lamola makes some sweeping comments about South African philosophers during the apartheid era and insinuates parallels with those today who ask questions about what a decolonised curriculum is. His arguments here are unclear, are based on false and insufficiently nuanced claims, and are pregnant with innuendo. In my response I demonstrate this

  • Famine, Affluence, and Procreation

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics

    Jessica du Toit, David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

    Sara Kolmes has argued that the human ‘handlers’ of emotional support animals (ESAs) should have the sorts of body-like rights to those animals that people with prosthetics have to their prosthetics. In support of this conclusion, she argues that ESAs both function and feel like prosthetics, and that the disanalogies between ESAs and prosthetics are irrelevant to whether humans can have body-like rights to their ESAs. In response, we argue that M…

  • Misconceived

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2022

  • Ethically defensible executions? A reply to Daniel Rodger and coauthors

    David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The Paradox of Desert

    Open Access•David Benatar•ARTICLE•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

    This article describes a paradoxical phenomenon arising from the fact that those who act rightly often pay a price for doing so. The paradox is that the very thing – acting rightly – that incurs the cost also makes the cost (especially) undeserved. In explicating the paradox, I distinguish between two kinds of cost (internal and external), two kinds of unfairness (intrinsic and comparative), and two manifestations of the paradox (prospective and …

Philosophy (15 works) · Epistemology (13 works) · Sociology (12 works) · Psychology (11 works) · Political science (9 works) · Law (8 works) · Environmental ethics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Applied philosophy (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae