Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sentience and Why It Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID21598423
AuthorsDavid Benatar (0000-0003-3115-9172, University of Cape Town, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume34
Issue4
Pages563-571
Publication date2025-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-1801 • E-ISSN: 1469-2147
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0963180126100085
PMID42046484
OpenAlexW7156669622
LanguageEN
References cited2

In this article, it is argued that in the actual world, even if not in all possible worlds, sentience is both a necessary and sufficient condition for having moral standing. In arguing for this conclusion, the concepts of sentience and moral standing are explained. Five kinds of interest are then differentiated—functional, biotic, sentient, sapient, and self-conscious. It is argued that having sentient interests, rather than merely any interests, is what grounds moral standing. However, determining who has moral standing is only a beginning. Once we know whose interests we need to consider, we still need to know what interests need to be considered. We also need to know what considering those interests implies. Those questions are engaged in the remainder of this article

Animal welfare · Remainder · Sentience · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory

  • Better Never to Have Been

    David Benatar•Better Never to Have Been•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae