Vices in Gaming

Can video games or the playing of such games be morally objectionable? Many attempts to justify our intuitions about the morality of certain games or game activities are either unsuccessful or fall short. This is mainly due to a normative gap between reality and virtuality that classical approaches to moral philosophy cannot bridge. I am investigating to what extent an accurate action analysis can help us to justify our intuitions that, in some cases, something is ethically wrong with video games. To do so, I am using Frankfurt’s volition theory to show how virtual game actions can be evaluated based on virtue ethics. This virtue ethical assessment is compatible with Ostritsch’s (2017) endorsement view. Especially in light of the gamification of our surroundings, the question of the ethical status of video gaming is becoming more and more urgent. By arguing that a virtue ethical approach can tell us more about the ethical aspects of video gaming, I will also argue that virtue ethics (because of similar problems in these fields) is promising regarding the ethics of simulation, art, and literature

Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · International law · International political economy · Law and economics · Ontology · Political science · Public international law · Sociology · Virtue · Virtue ethics · Doping in Sports · Engineering · Gambling Behavior and Treatments · Law · Philosophy

• Between consenting avatars

  Open Access•Clemens Uhing, Bert Heinrichs•Ethics and Information Technology•2026

  Add to list