Between consenting avatars
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21703485 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clemens Uhing (University of Bonn, corresponding author), Bert Heinrichs (0000-0002-0181-0078, University of Bonn) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1388-1957 • E-ISSN: 1572-8439 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-026-09901-5 |
| OpenAlex | W7152587473 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
As virtual reality and virtual worlds in general take up more and more space in people’s everyday lives, the question of how virtual actions should be morally evaluated becomes increasingly pressing. One of the main challenges in the ethics of virtual worlds, in our view, is to find a normative framework, that is not overly restrictive but still accounts for common intuitions, such as the immorality of discrimination or harassment in virtual realms. In this paper we ask which criterion could be suitable to allow for a more nuanced evaluation of various potentially immoral virtual actions. First, we introduce a case to distinguish possible harms and immoral behaviors in virtual worlds. We then present a concept of consent inspired by principlism in research ethics and discuss criteria for valid consent and its limits. In applying this to our case, we find that consent can render many allegedly immoral actions in virtual worlds – such as virtual killing or theft – morally permissible, while it cannot be used to justify discrimination or violations of personal identity. A consent-based approach is thus shown to successfully reconstruct common moral intuitions, like those on the gamers’ dilemma. Finally, we address some objections to our argument, namely objections from deontological ethics and virtue ethics. The result of the paper is a framework for the moral evaluation of virtual actions, that allows for a more balanced approach and takes the particular purposes of virtual worlds and the interests of participating individuals into account
Consequentialism · Deontological ethics · Immorality · Information ethics · Metaverse · Normative · Normative ethics · Virtual reality · Virtue · Digital Games and Media · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 3
Shaping the Normative Landscape
Moral Thinking
The Virtual and the Real
Metaanalysis of the relationship between violent video game play and physical aggression over time
A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (Five)
The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality
Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?
The badness of discrimination
All too real metacapitalism
May Kantians commit virtual killings that affect no other persons
A Kantian response to the Gamer’s Dilemma
Virtual action
The Physical and Social Reality of Virtual Worlds
Vices in Gaming
Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |