Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Notes of Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID13618653
AuthorsJ Simon (0000-0001-8703-7081, corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume43
Issue2
Pages202-228
Publication date1980-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2230.1980.tb01590.x
OpenAlexW4234238656
LanguageEN

Quazi v. Quazil the House of Lords has for the first time considered the question of recognition by the English courts of non-judicial divorces. At common law, this was a relatively straightforward matter, but it has been a perplexing problem ever since the Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separations Act 1971 ("the Recognition Act ") and the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 (" the Domicile Act ") came into force.2 Thc source of the problem is the use in these Acts of the words "proceeding" and " proceedings

Citation · Information retrieval · Library science · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Discrimination and Equality Law · Energy Law and Policy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae