Public Opinion Polls on the Death Penalty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13647808 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C H S Jayewardene (University of Ottawa, corresponding author), Avtar Singh (0000-0002-7552-930X, University of Ottawa) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 3_suppl |
| Pages | 1191-1195 |
| Publication date | 1979-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1979.44.3c.1191 |
| OpenAlex | W2083858935 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The present study reports questionnaire data obtained from a public opinion survey ( N, 1256) conducted in Ottawa, Canada, with regard to opinions concerning the death penalty. The sample was divided into five groups on the basis of their support for or against the death penalty. In terms of Festinger's theory of dissonance, Abolitionists and Near-retentionists were the two most consistent groups. The opinion of these two groups seemed to be based on rational and informed opinion, while other groups seemed to have responded to the questionnaire in a rather haphazard fashion. These findings draw attention to utilization of public opinion polls in formulating public policy
Cognitive dissonance · Opinion poll · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Sample (material · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law
Conflict, decision, and dissonance.
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Group dynamics
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Computers, polls, & public opinion—Some puzzles & paradoxes
Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reactions to cognitive inconsistency
| Highly cited | No |
|---|