Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparison of Visual “Safe-” and “Shock-”Cue Importance in Discriminated Avoidance Learning

Bibliographic Data

ID13654265
AuthorsBruce A Pappas (Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, corresponding author), P C Dodwell (Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario), Alfred Zammit-Montebello (Queen's University), H Bruce Ferguson (0000-0002-0902-2092, Queen's University), Joseph Litner (Queen's University), J S Litner (Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario)
Year1969
Volume24
Issue2
Pages491-498
Publication date1969-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.1969.24.2.491
OpenAlexW2048890798
LanguageEN
References cited7

Rats reached criterion for discriminated avoidance acquisition significantly faster under a 180-sec. than under a 30-sec. safebox confinement. Reversal (Exp. 1) and extinction (Exp. 2) of the original avoidance response were both facilitated by removal of either original safe or shock cues. No interaction was found between length of confinement in acquisition and safe- or shock-cue removal. The results were interpreted as only partially supporting an elicitation hypothesis of discriminated avoidance learning

Audiology · Avoidance learning · Avoidance response · Cognitive psychology · Extinction (optical mineralogy · Optics · Physics · Shock (circulatory · Communication · Medicine · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Psychology · Stress Responses and Cortisol

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae