Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Hood Mysticism Scale

Does the Presence of a Neutral Response-Item Affect Response Style

Bibliographic Data

ID13655340
AuthorsClaire Mercer (0000-0002-7628-5984, East Carolina University, corresponding author), Calvin Mercer (East Carolina University), Thomas W Durham (East Carolina University)
Year2001
Volume88
Issue2
Pages335-338
Publication date2001-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.2001.88.2.335
PMID11351868
OpenAlexW2088500612
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

The widely used Hood Mysticism Scale (1975) was administered to one of two groups of college students in its original version and a modified version without the option of responding with "?" to an item. Scoring of the scale assigns an intermediate value to the "?" response, suggesting this response implies a meaning on the item somewhere between "probably true" and "probably not true." Omitting this response option requires respondents to make a forced-choice answer, either to agree or to disagree with a statement and eliminates the middle ground. It was hypothesized that, if the response reflects a neutral attitude, then randomly selected groups administered the scale with or without the option should show no difference in overall means. An intact group of 23 advanced psychology students achieved a mean of 114.4 (SD = 20.4) on the original mysticism scale, while 25 advanced psychology students in a second intact group had a mean of 113.3 (SD = 17.1) on the modified version. This difference was not significant and supported the hypothesis that the scales were equivalent. Advantages of the modification and implications for interpretation of the "?" response are discussed

Affect (linguistics · Art · Cartography · Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Mysticism · Psychotherapist · Scale (ratio · Statement (logic · Style (visual arts · Theology · Visual arts · Communication · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Measuring God Mysticism

    Open Access•Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Lindsey W Vilca et al.•Pastoral Psychology•2023

  • Assessing Spiritual Crises

    Open Access•Gerhard Bronn, Doris Mcilwain•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2014

  • Response Sets and Test Validity

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Educational and Psychological…•1946

  • An Analysis of the Meaning of the Question Mark Response Category in Attitude Scales

    Open Access•Bernard Dubois, John A Burns•Educational and Psychological…•1975

  • Theory and methods of scaling

    Warren S Torgerson•Theory and methods of scaling.•1965

  • Don't Know

    Clyde H Coombs, Lolagene C Coombs•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • "What We Now Know About "I Don't Knows

    Joe D Francis, Joe Francis et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1975

  • On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement

    Kalman J Kaplan•Psychological Bulletin•1972

  • The Construction and Preliminary Validation of a Measure of Reported Mystical Experience

    Ralph W Hood•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1975

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2014 - 2023 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae