Interrater Agreement on Employees' Job Performance
Review and Directions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13659456 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Valle (0000-0001-7284-4868, Elon University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 975-975 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.90.3.975-985 |
| OpenAlex | W4248112725 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 62 |
This paper reviews the literature on interrater agreement in 360° feedback systems. Multirater performance appraisals, e.g., 360° feedback systems, have long been advocated as important mechanisms for enhancing individual and organizational performance. Our review of the empirical literature indicates that interrater agreement is a highly desired but not often accomplished goal in 360° feedback systems. A review of the assumptions concerning interrater agreement suggests avenues for the evolution of assessment scales used for development and evaluation in organizations
Agreement · Developmental psychology · Inter-rater reliability · Job performance · Job satisfaction · Rating scale · Applied Psychology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|