A Validity Generalization Procedure to Test Relations between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and Influence Tactics

Bibliographic Data

ID13665229
AuthorsJohn E Barbuto (0000-0001-7046-7405, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, corresponding author), Jennifer A Moss (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
Year2006
Volume99
Issue1
Pages121-124
Publication date2006-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.99.1.121-124
PMID17037458
OpenAlexW2057499880
LanguageEN
References cited11

The relations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation with use of consultative, legitimating, and pressure influence tactics were examined using validity generalization procedures. 5 to 7 field studies with cumulative samples exceeding 800 were used to test each relationship. Significance was found for relation between agents' intrinsic motivation and their use of consultative influence tactics and agents' extrinsic motivation and their use of legitimating influence tactics

Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Epistemology · External validity · Generalization · Intrinsic motivation · Political science · Psychometrics · Self-determination theory · Test (biology · Test validity · Validation test · Cultural Differences and Values · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub