Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Postaids Structure of Students' Attitudes to Condoms

Age, Sex and Experience of Use

Bibliographic Data

ID13669213
AuthorsPaschal Sheeran (0000-0001-7449-4590, University of Dundee, corresponding author), D Abrams (University of Kent at Cantebury), Douglas Auteur du texte Abrams (University of Kent), S C S Abraham (Dundee Institute of Technology), Russell Spears (0000-0001-5244-0575, University of Amsterdam), Deborah Marks (University of Dundee)
Year1990
Volume66
Issue2
Pages614-614
Publication date1990-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.1990.66.2.614
PMID2349352
OpenAlexW2111500178
LanguageEN
Citations received7

A central aspect of health education campaigns designed to prevent the spread of HIV has been to encourage people to use condoms during sexual intercourse. Little research has, however, been carried out on attitudes towards condoms. The present study investigated the post-AIDS structure of students' attitudes to condoms and examined the association of subjects' age, sex, and experience of use with those attitudes. Subject were students attending a university and a polytechnic in Dundee, Scotland. Out of 600 questionnaires sent out 318 were returned after reminders, a response rate of 53%. Attitudes towards condoms were measured using 8 5-point Likert items. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation produced 3 orthogonal factors accounting for 61.0% of the variance. The factors were labelled Condom Effectiveness (26.3%), Condom Offensiveness (21.0%), and Condom Attractiveness (13.7%). Factor scores were computed by reversing the scoring of items with negative loadings and averaging across items within factors. Condoms were considered quite effective among the present sample (M=4.0, SD+0.6, range=1.5). Subjects also believed, however, that condoms were somewhat offensive (M=3.4, SD=0.6) and unattractive to use (M=2.7, SD=0.8). Women considered condoms more offensive than men (F 1273=11.06, p.001) and subjects who had previously used condoms during sex considered condoms more effective (F1273=4.85, p.05) and less offensive (F1273=12.18, p.001) than those who had never used them. Clearly these concerns about the condom on dimensions of effectiveness, offensiveness and attractiveness might be a barrier to intentions to change behavior and need to be addressed by health education campaigns. Such initiatives must, as Abrams, Abraham, Spears, and Marks (1990) and Abraham, Sheeran, Abrahams, and Spears (in press) point out, be targeted towards the concerns of particular groups such as those examined here. (full text)

Condom · Developmental psychology · Family medicine · Family planning · Gynecology · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Likert scale · Offensive · Population · Psychometrics · Research methodology · Safer sex · Varimax rotation · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Clinical Psychology · Demography · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use

    Pascal Sheeran, Charles Abraham et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1999

  • Predicting Intentions to Use Condoms

    Open Access•Paschal Sheeran, Steven Taylor et al.•Journal of Applied Social…•1999

  • Context and content

    Dominic Abrams, Paschal Sheeran et al.•AIDS Care•1992

  • HIV/Aids education in Tanzania

    Cyprian N Maro, Glyn C Roberts et al.•Vulnerable Children and Youth…•2009

  • Adolescent self‐efficacy, self‐esteem and sexual risk‐taking

    Open Access•Doreen Rosenthal, Susan Moore et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•1991

  • Trying to practice safer sex

    Dana Dehart, Dana D DeHart et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•1997

  • The condom

    Open Access•Jan Browne, Minichiello et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•1994

Citations per year0.2
Citation span1991 - 2009 (19)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae