Modification of Forced-Choice Format for Use in Personnel Selection and Appraisal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13670540 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allan N Nash (University of Maryland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1971 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 108-110 |
| Publication date | 1971-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.1.108 |
| OpenAlex | W2088952925 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Implications of a “mixed triad” format for forced-choice scales on the acceptability and validity of such scales in selection and appraisal instruments are discussed and results of a pilot study ( N = 15) which is interpreted as supporting the use of the suggested format for such instruments are presented
Cognitive psychology · Personnel selection · Selection (genetic algorithm · Statistics · Triad (sociology · Two-alternative forced choice · Applied Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|