Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Role of Distinctive Processing during Retrieval

Bibliographic Data

ID13670746
AuthorsTracy Matthews (Citadel, corresponding author), T DARIN MATTHEWS (The Citadel), Rebekah E Smith (0000-0002-9297-9177, University of North Carolina at Greensboro), R Reed Hunt (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Christine E Pivetta (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Year1999
Volume84
Issue3
Pages904-916
Publication date1999-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3.904
OpenAlexW1977874851
LanguageEN
References cited17

Encoding tasks that engage both distinctive and organizational processing produce superior recall relative to tasks that engage only one type of processing (e.g., Hunt & Einstein, 1981). In 1993, Hunt and McDaniel proposed that organizational processing entails the relationships that specify the encoding episode, while distinctive processing allows the discrimination of particular items that share those relationships. The experiments presented here replicate previous findings from cued recall tests supporting the proposed roles for distinctive and organizational processing. Unlike previous research that generally has been limited to the use of encoding manipulations to investigate the benefits of these processes, the present experiments contrasted performance on tests of cued recall and category production. The results showed that the usefulness of distinctive processing is limited to testing situations that require production of specific items. In contrast, organization is shown to be beneficial for both cued recall and category production. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that organization and distinctiveness serve different functions in recall and support the use of Tenpenny and Shoben's 1992 component process analysis in the investigation of retrieval

Cognitive psychology · Cued recall · Cued speech · Encoding (memory · Free recall · Information processing · Optimal distinctiveness theory · Recall · Information Retrieval and Search Behavior · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Radiology practices and education · Social Psychology

  • Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.

    William F Battig, William E Montague•Journal of Experimental…•1969

  • Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words

    Open Access•Endel Tulving, Zena Pearlstone•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1966

  • Relational and item-specific information in memory

    Open Access•R Reed Hunt, Gilles O Einstein•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1981

  • Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing

    Open Access•Catherine Morris, C Donald Morris et al.•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1977

  • The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness

    Open Access•R Reed Hunt, Mark A Mcdaniel•Journal of Memory and Language•1993

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae