Homosexual Parents
Why Appeals Cases Approximatethe 'Gold Standard' for Science--a Reply to Duncan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13675245 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Cameron (0000-0002-1906-6945, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 793-793 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.84.3.793-802 |
| OpenAlex | W4243330323 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Unlike the unverifiable claims of volunteers in studies of homosexual parenting, an alert ex-spouse is ready to testify as to the falsity of any claim by the other spouse in custody proceedings. Further, a greater variety of professionals are involved in getting at the “truth.” We argue that examination of an unbiased corpus of such appeals cases is far more apt to reflect the underlying “reality” about homosexual parenting than studies performed on volunteers
Developmental psychology · Gold standard (test · Clinical Psychology · Internal Medicine · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |