Homosexual Parents
Why Appeals Cases Approximate the “Gold Standard” for Science—A Reply to Duncan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13675388 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Cameron (0000-0002-1906-6945, Family Research Institute, corresponding author), Kirk Cameron (Family Research Institute) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 793-802 |
| Publication date | 1999-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3.793 |
| PMID | 10408202 |
| OpenAlex | W2070658931 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 8 |
Unlike the unverifiable claims of volunteers in studies of homosexual parenting, an alert ex-spouse is ready to testify as to the falsity of any claim by the other spouse in custody proceedings. Further, a greater variety of professionals are involved in getting at the "truth." We argue that examination of an unbiased corpus of such appeals cases is far more apt to reflect the underlying "reality" about homosexual parenting than studies performed on volunteers
Developmental psychology · Gold standard (test · Statistics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2004 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |