Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparability of Columbia Mental Maturity Scale and Stanford-Binet, Form L-M, Estimates of Intelligence

Bibliographic Data

ID13675575
AuthorsDavid Ritter (0000-0002-0293-7687, Montgomery County Schools, Pennsylvania), David R Ritter (Montgomery County Public Schools, corresponding author), James B Duffey (Montgomery County Public Schools), James Duffey (Montgomery County Schools, Pennsylvania), Ronald Fischman (Montgomery County Schools, Pennsylvania)
Year1974
Volume34
Issue1
Pages174-174
Publication date1974-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.1974.34.1.174
OpenAlexW2324636927
LanguageEN
References cited2

The Columbia Mental Maturity Scale is an individually administered intelligence test designed for use with children ages 3Y2 to 9 yr. (Burgemeister & Blum, 1972). It correlates moderately (.40 to .50) with picture vocabulary tests such as the Peabody, Ammons, and Van Alstyne (Dunn & Harley, 1959) and with the Wide Range Achievement Test (Smith, 1961). Correlation coefficients with non-verbal measures of intelligence, such as the Pictorial Test of Intelligence (French, 1964) and the Leiter International Performance Scale (Miller, 1967), have been within the .50 to .60 range. These concurrent validity studies were conducted with the 1959 revision of the Columbia Scale in which the ratio IQ was still utilized. The present study compared estimates of intelligence on the 1972 revision of the Columbia Scale employing the deviation IQ and the Stanford-Binet for 45 educable mentally retarded children enrolled in preschool or special education classes. The children ranged in age from 4 yr., 11 mo. to 9 yr., 10 mo., with a mean age of 7 yr., 8 mo. All were administered the 1972 revision of the Columbia Mental Maturity Scale and the Stanford-Binet, Form L-M. The order of test administration was alternated and all tests were administered by certified school psychologists. The mean IQs (e standard deviations) for the tests were: Columbia, 74.56e14.40; Stanford-Binet, 72.14+12.50. A t test for dependent groups did not indicate a significant ( P . m ) difference between the means. A Pearson product-moment correlarion of .74 was obtained between the Columbia IQ and the Stanford-Binet IQ, suggesting good concurrent validity although the verbal and non-verbal requirements of the two instruments are different. The distribution of the intelligence quotients for the two tests was also comparable. For the Columbia Scale, all but six of the IQs fell within the 65 to 80 point range. One IQ was below 65 while the remaining five IQs were between 8 0 and 87. For the Stanford-Binet, all but four IQs were within the 65 to 80 ~ o i n t catenorv. One I 0 fell above 80 and three 10s were below . 65 points

Cognition · Columbia university · Comparability · Developmental psychology · Intelligence quotient · Percentile · Percentile rank · Psychiatry · Scale (ratio · Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales · Statistics · Test (biology · Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale · Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Mathematics · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae