Performance Evaluation
A Case for the Use of Consensus Ratings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13675591 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence S Kleiman (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, corresponding author), John W Lounsbury (University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Robert H Faley (Kent State University) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 407-413 |
| Publication date | 1987-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1987.60.2.407 |
| OpenAlex | W2121031588 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
Data from a sample of government research scientists were used to compare the psychometric properties of pooled and consensus ratings of job performance. It was hypothesized that consensus ratings would possess less halo and leniency error and greater validity than would pooled ratings. The findings supported the halo hypothesis and partially supported the validity hypothesis. Given the severity of the “criterion problem” in validation research, further research was recommended to extend the generalizability of these findings to other performance appraisal settings
Construct validity · Criterion validity · Developmental psychology · External validity · Generalizability theory · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Accounting and Organizational Management · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2007 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |