Multistakeholder Perceptions of Priorities in Primary Care as a Source of Local Innovation

Qualitative Descriptive Study

Dados Bibliográficos

ID13776173
AutoresGerri Lamb (0000-0002-9583-8783, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA, autor correspondente), Jane Hook (Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA), Richard Kratche (0009-0006-1600-2483, CommonSpirit, Phoenix, AZ, USA), Kristen K Will (0000-0001-5069-7465, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA), David W Coon (0000-0002-5224-3886, Arizona State University), David Coon (Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA), Nina Karamehmedovic (Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA)
Ano2025
Volume62
Páginas469580251361993-469580251361993
Data de publicação2025-07-30
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoINQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0046-9580 • E-ISSN: 1945-7243
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00469580251361993
PMID40735796
OpenAlexW4412760254
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas28

The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to compare the needs and priorities of multiple stakeholder groups as a source of local innovation to improve primary care. Focus groups were conducted with 44 members of 7 primary care stakeholder groups associated with a large health system and its academic and community networks. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Initial categories for the content analysis were drawn from the Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER 2.0) framework. Three CLER 2.0 concepts, quality health care, teaming, and wellbeing were central to an optimal primary care experience for all groups. Quality health care was the top priority across groups. Shared themes included having meaningful relationships and achieving healthy outcomes. While all groups perceived teaming and wellbeing as important, each stakeholder group had different priorities. Willingness to engage in teaming was conditional on its ability to meet both shared and unique needs. Our findings suggest that shared priorities among primary care stakeholder groups provide a robust foundation for local innovation. Understanding differences in priorities is necessary to identify conditions of engagement across groups. Creative integration of common and unique priorities is key to sustainable local innovation

Business · Content analysis · Descriptive research · Focus group · Health care · Knowledge management · Medical education · Nominal group technique · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Stakeholder engagement · Computer Science · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology