Evaluation of Mountain Case Studies by Means of Sustainability Variables
A DPSIR Model as an Evaluation Tool in the Context of the North–South Discussion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13908697 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Odermatt (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 336-341 |
| Publication date | 2004-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mountain Research and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0276-4741 • E-ISSN: 1994-7151 |
| Publisher | International Mountain Society (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0336:eomcsb]2.0.co;2 |
| OpenAlex | W1906657974 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 6 |
The International Year of Mountains (IYM) 2002 drew attention to mountain regions and their fragile ecosystems. The present article makes a comparative analysis of mountain case studies from developing countries (DCs) and industrialized countries (ICs) using sustainability variables in the framework of a Driving force–Pressure–State–Impact–Response Model (DPSIR Model). Response variables, ie efforts made by society to move towards sustainable mountain development (SMD), are believed to improve the situation with regard to sustainability, and are a focus of this study. In the course of the IYM, a total of 40 appropriate case studies were analyzed, to demonstrate the wide variety of approaches to SMD. Case studies that deal with themes considered to be particularly important in mountain regions were chosen for analysis. Such key themes include freshwater, forestry, agriculture, poverty, indigenous knowledge, migration, tourism, and legislation. Variables of great importance in any mountain area include “involvement of stakeholders in planning and development process (public participation)” and “gathering of baseline information.” Additional challenges to SMD in DCs include lack of options to facilitate out-migration, declining forest cover, insufficient access to resources, and poverty. The main conclusion of this study is that the DPSIR Model that was applied is an adequate tool with which to analyze SMD case studies, especially studies relating to DCs
Business · DPSIR · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Indigenous · Political science · Poverty · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Tourism · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond · Ecology
Mountains of the world
Priorities for sustainable mountain development in Europe
Development Indicators for Mountain Regions
Preventing and Resolving Water Use Conflicts in the Mount Kenya Highland–Lowland System through Water Users' Associations
Sustainability of Mountain Environments in India and Canada
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2017 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |