Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Irrelevant Conjunction

Statement and Solution of a New Paradox

Bibliographic Data

ID14432131
AuthorsVincenzo Crupi (0000-0003-3545-6289), Katya Tentori (0000-0002-5968-9936)
Year2010
Volume77
Issue1
Pages1-13
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/650205
OpenAlexW1550578911
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited20

The so-called problem of irrelevant conjunction has been seen as a serious challenge for theories of confirmation. It involves the consequences of conjoining irrelevant statements to a hypothesis that is confirmed by some piece of evidence. Following Hawthorne and Fitelson, we reconstruct the problem with reference to Bayesian confirmation theory. Then we extend it to the case of conjoining irrelevant statements to a hypothesis that is dis confirmed by some piece of evidence. As a consequence, we obtain and formally present a novel and more troublesome problem of irrelevant conjunction. We conclude by indicating a possible solution based on a measure-sensitive approach and by critically discussing a major alternative way to address the problem

Bayesian probability · Conjunction (astronomy) · Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Measure (data warehouse) · Statement (logic) · Artificial Intelligence · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

    Open Access•Deborah G Mayo•Statistical Inference As Severe…•2018

  • The Rehabilitation of Deductive Reasoning

    Open Access•Thomas Bartelborth•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

  • A neglected response to the paradoxes of confirmation

    Murali Ramachandran•South African Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • Irrelevant conjunction and the ratio measure or historical skepticism

    Open Access•J Brian Pitts•Synthese•2013

  • Does information inform confirmation

    Open Access•Colin Howson•Synthese•2016

  • State of the field

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems)

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori•Philosophy of Science•2012

  • The Problem of Measure Sensitivity Redux

    Open Access•Peter Brössel•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • Genuine Confirmation and Tacking by Conjunction

    Open Access•Michael Schippers, Gerhard Schurz•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • New Axioms for Probability and Likelihood Ratio Measures

    Vincenzo Crupi, Nick Chater et al.•The British Journal for the…•2013

  • On Three Measures of Explanatory Power with Axiomatic Representations

    Michael P Cohen•The British Journal for the…•2016

  • Bayes or bust?

    John Earman•Bayes or bust?•1992

  • From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism

    Open Access•Theo A F Kuipers•From Instrumentalism to…•2000

  • A Treatise on Probability

    Open Access•John Maynard Keynes•A Treatise on Probability•1973

  • Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and relational confirmation

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Synthese•2007

  • Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions among Hypotheses

    Open Access•Henry A Finch, Henry Finch•Philosophy of Science•1960

  • The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy of Science•1999

  • Bayesianism and Irrelevant Conjunction

    Open Access•Patrick Maher•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • Logical Foundations of Evidential Support

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy of Science•2006

  • On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori et al.•Philosophy of Science•2007

  • A Theory of Evidence

    Open Access•Nicholas Rescher•Philosophy of Science•1958

  • Putting the Irrelevance Back Into the Problem of Irrelevant Conjunction

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • Degree of Factual Support

    Open Access•John G Kemeny, Paul Oppenheim•Philosophy of Science•1952

  • Log [ P ( h / eb )/ P ( h / b )] Is the One True Measure of Confirmation

    Open Access•Peter Milne•Philosophy of Science•1996

  • Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions among Hypotheses, Part II

    Open Access•Henry A Finch, Henry Finch•Philosophy of Science•1960

  • Milne's Argument for the Log-Ratio Measure

    Open Access•Franz Huber•Philosophy of Science•2008

  • Solving the Tacking Problem with Contrast Classes

    Jake Chandler•The British Journal for the…•2007

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    R D Rosenkrantz•The British Journal for the…•1994

  • Probability and evidence

    Paul Horwich•Probability and evidence•2016

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,79
Citation span2012 - 2020 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae