Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens’ Initiative Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14513625 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Genevieve Fuji Johnson (0000-0001-8882-5784, Simon Fraser University, corresponding author), Michael E Morrell (University of Connecticut System), Laura W Black (0000-0001-8353-3758, Ohio University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2168-2187 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ssqu.12707 |
| OpenAlex | W2968440856 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 27 |
Objective Emotions in deliberative democratic practices have been of interest to researchers and practitioners of democracy for years. Yet, scholars have not fully analyzed emotions in this context. We advance this discussion in terms of both data collection and analysis with respect to Citizens' Initiative Reviews (CIRs) in Arizona, Oregon, and Massachusetts in 2016. We respond to four central research questions: (1) What discrete emotions do participants report experiencing during mini‐public deliberation? (2) How do the reported emotions vary across the period of deliberation? (3) How do the expressed emotions affect the deliberation? and (4) What work do expressed emotions do in mini‐publics in terms of helping or hindering deliberation? Methods To ensure a comprehensive analysis of the data we were able to collect, we employ a mixed‐methods design and use both quantitative and qualitative methods. Results and Conclusion Ultimately, we contend that the activities and tasks of the group, as well as the behaviors of participants and relationships among them, are all important factors that shape how people experience emotion, but that the CIR procedures have the greatest influence in mediating emotions to serve the ends of deliberation in these mini‐publics
Affect (linguistics) · Context (archaeology) · Data collection · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Social science · Sociology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Public participation in health and Covid-19 in Portugal
Participação pública em saúde e Covid-19 em Portugal
Mutual Need
Listening Quality Index
Mixed Methods
Deliberation, Polarization, and Emotion
Mini-Public Replication
Confronting Politics
Psychological Phenomena in Democratic Deliberation
Obstacles to constitutional participation
Hopes over fears
Measuring Democratic Listening
The Dynamics of Social Identity
Anxiety as a Positive Epistemic Emotion in Politics
Emotion and Political Psychology
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion
Civil Passions
Norms of Deliberation
Assessing the Difference Critique of Deliberation
Two-Year Study of Emotion and Communication Patterns in a Highly Polarized Political Discussion Forum
Debating restrictions on embryonic stem cell research
Citizens’ Initiative Review process
The Role of Emotion in Enabling and Conditioning Public Deliberation Outcomes
Personality and Emotional Response
Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition
The Trouble with Passion
Empathy in a Citizen Deliberation Experiment
Against Deliberation
Recognizing the Emotion Work in Deliberation. Why Emotions Do Not Make Deliberative Democracy More Democratic
The emotional dynamics of deliberative democracy
Toward a Democracy of the Emotions
Varieties and effects of emotional content in public deliberation
Developmental sequence in small groups
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |