Reporting Guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health ’s Adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Bibliographic Data
Widespread recognition of the need to improve the science of published research, as well as the moral and ethical reasons for adequately reporting study results, has spurred recent interest in strengthening journal research reporting through the use of reporting guidelines. Reporting guidelines also provide information for readers to judge study quality. American Journal of Public Health previously adopted the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs guidelines and recently endorsed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In adopting these guidelines, the journal aims to support authors, reviewers, and editors in reporting and evaluating systematic reviews of public health policy and practice priorities
Alternative medicine · Family medicine · Medical education · MEDLINE · Meta-analysis · Political science · Public health · Systematic review · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Sciences Research and Education · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Nursing · Psychology
A systematic review of the factors associated with delays in medical and psychological help-seeking among men
Intervention Studies
The inaccuracy of data from online surveys
A Systematic Review of Standardized Assessments of Couple and Family Constructs in GLBT Populations
Problematic integration theory
Opportunities for Engaging Low-Income, Vulnerable Populations in Health Care
A Public Health Response to the Ryan War on Poverty Report
Mentoring for Publication in the American Journal of Public Health
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Consort statement
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Reporting Implementation in Randomized Trials
Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions
The Importance of External Validity
AJPH Endorsement of Transparency, Clarity, and Rigor
Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
| Citations per year | 0.62 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |