Self‐ratings, supervisor ratings, positions and performance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14683707 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Lane (0000-0002-7238-7836, 21c Consultancy (United Kingdom)), Peter Herriot (0000-0003-2961-9555, Birkbeck, University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 77-88 |
| Publication date | 1990-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Occupational Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-8107 • E-ISSN: 2056-8142 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00511.x |
| OpenAlex | W2113475049 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Self‐ratings and supervisor ratings were obtained for 40 unit managers. Self‐ratings were predicted by length of service, whereas supervisor ratings were also predicted by previous appraisal ratings, performance, and career progression. Both self‐ratings and supervisor ratings predicted subsequent performance in the form of unit admissions and gross profit. The predictive power of self‐ratings was explained in terms of the interactive theory of self‐efficacy
Management · Performance appraisal · Predictive power · Self evaluation · Supervisor · Accounting and Organizational Management · Applied Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 2004 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |