GIS and Geographic Governance
Reconstructing the Choropleth Map
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14701290 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Crampton (Georgia State University), Jeremy W Crampton (0000-0001-5702-0430, Georgia State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41-53 |
| Publication date | 2004-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0317-7173 • E-ISSN: 1911-9925 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/h066-3346-r941-6382 |
| OpenAlex | W1980943237 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
| References cited | 14 |
This paper takes up the challenge of "reconstructing gis" by examining gis and governmental rationality. As an aspect of government, mapping is a vital source of geographic knowledge that informs political decision-making. Of particular importance to geographic governance and management are population distributions such as health, wealth, education, density, or criminality. Yet how these distributions have been mapped has shifted and been contested historically. Whereas in the early nineteenth century populations merely filled in pre-existing political areas, by the early twentieth century populations were understood as themselves defining areas and boundaries. Today, gis has returned to the earlier unproblematic politics of space. I explain these shifts by identifying similar shifts between the choropleth and the dasymetric map. Although commonly used, the choropleth is inadequate and misleading. I discuss the possible reasons for these shifts by re-emphasizing mapping as an aspect of geographic governance
Cartography · Corporate governance · Economic geography · Economics · Geographic information system · Geography · Government (linguistics · Governmentality · Management · Political science · Politics · Population · Rationality · Regional science · Sociology · Census and Population Estimation · Computer Science · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Law
Geographic information science
Code/Space
Space, Knowledge and Power
Los mapas y la transición digital
Spatial adventures in energy studies
Geographic Information Systems
Voir l'Europe pour la faire
Drawing on borders
Governmentality, congestion and calculation in colonial Delhi
Cartography
The Map Proves It”
The Cartographic State
Rethinking the Recap
Digitizing the Dragon Head, Geo-Coding the Urban Landscape
Mapping the Cold War
Visualizing Ambient Population Data within Census Boundaries
Uninhabited, Unused, Untravelled, or Uncharted? Sparsely or Unpopulated Areas and Gridded Population Data
Cartographic Enclosure and Urban Cadastral Mapping in the Ethiopian Somali Capital
Setting the Record Straight
Performative Atlases
Cartographic Inference
The Discourse and Discipline of GIS
Factors shaping cartographic representations of inequalities. Maps as products and processes
Towards the construction of place‐specific measures of deprivation
Queering the Map
Beyond Cooptation or Resistance
New urban spaces under Modi’s digital India – digitization of urban governance and state-citizen relationship
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in International Relations
Negotiating GIS and Social Theory in Population Geography
Geo-graphing Violence
The Biopolitical Justification for Geosurveillance
What does SNAP benefit usage tell us about food access in low-income neighborhoods
London Labour and the London Poor
Some Considerations on the Geographical Provinces of the United States
Dasymetric Mapping and Areal Interpolation
The Anthropography of Some Great Cities. A Study in Distribution of Population
John Kirtland Wright, 1891–1969
Cartographic Rationality and the Politics of Geosurveillance and Security
Governmentality and the mastery of territory in nineteenth-century America
Political power beyond the State
Mark Jefferson, Geographer
Liberal government and authoritarianism
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,6 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 32 |