Navigating Dichotomies and Labels
Identifying and Interpreting Ritual Artefacts in Prehistory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14713966 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Milena Gošić (0000-0002-6129-5186, University of Belgrade, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0353-1589 • E-ISSN: 2334-8801 |
| Publisher | University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Ethnology and Anthropology (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21301/eap.v20i3.5 |
| OpenAlex | W4414877205 |
| Language | EN |
Ritual artefacts are reported in most archaeological excavations from the Epipalaeolithic period of the Levant onwards. However, the topic of ritual remains a contentious issue in archaeology, especially regarding what it means for an artefact to be labelled as ritual. On the one hand, there is a pervasive sense that there is a shared, largely implicit, idea of what is expected from such artefacts. On the other hand, there is extensive archaeological theory devoted to ritual practices, which often falls short when applied to the archaeological record. The aim of this paper, which uses examples from the Levantine Chalcolithic period, is to bridge this divide by applying the concept of ritual technology, which offers tangible ways of discussing ritual behaviour in relation to the material record it leaves behind, without drawing a clear line between concepts of ritual and utilitarian in the sense found in contemporary cultures
Archaeological record · Bridge (graph theory) · Dichotomy · Excavation · Period (music) · Prehistoric archaeology · Prehistory · Relation (database) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|