Distraction during persuasive communication
A meta‐analytic review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14717950 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David B Buller (0000-0001-7902-9129, a Assistant Professor of Speech Communication , Texas Tech University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 91-114 |
| Publication date | 1986-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communication Monographs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0363-7751 • E-ISSN: 1479-5787 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03637758609376130 |
| OpenAlex | W2059177285 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 39 |
Research on the effect of distraction has produced conflicting results and competing theoretical explanations. Nonetheless, distraction has been cited as the process by which violations of conversational expectations influence the outcomes of persuasive communications. In this study, results from 38 studies examining distraction were subjected to meta‐analysis. The results indicate it is necessary to distinguish between communication relevant distraction (produced by behaviors of the source) and communication irrelevant distractors. The former, including violations of conversational expectations, produce attitude change via source valence effects, while the latter, in general, reduce attitude change by reducing message comprehension. The counterarguing hypothesis receives little support, though questions concerning counterargument measures suggest that it may not have been put to a fair test. The type of communication irrelevant distraction influences the reduction in attitude change perhaps due to the cognitive load required to overcome the distraction. Overall, the effect of communication irrelevant distraction on attitude change is moderate at best
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Distraction · Persuasion · Persuasive communication · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance
Language, Fallacies, and Mindlessness-Mindfulness in Social Interaction
Information Systems Division
Strategies for Resisting Persuasion
A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them
Keeping Up with Media Multitasking
Manipulating and Measuring Media Multitasking
Testing a model of message sidedness
Messages as replications
Neural Predictors of Message Effectiveness during Counterarguing in Antidrug Campaigns
The uses of meta‐analysis
Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes
A new mobile data driven message strategy called synced advertising
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
When mutations meet motivations
Background Television as an Inhibitor of Cognitive Processing
Colloquy on Generalization Meta-Analytic Techniques When Generalizing to Message Populations Is Not Possible
The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension
Handbook of Social Psychology
The Effect of Visual Distraction upon Recall and Attitude Change
Credibility of Communicators and Distraction as Predictors of Change in Attitude
Distraction Hypothesis in Attitude Change
Distracting stimuli
Facilitative and Inhibiting Effects of Distraction on Attitude Change
Defaming and Agreeing with the Communicator as a Function of Emotional Arousal, Communication Extremity, and Evaluative Set
Experimental modification of the relationship between effort, attitude, and behavior
Distraction and self-esteem effects on attitude change
Resistance to persuasive communications
The effect of effort and improvisation on self-persuasion produced by role-playing
Acceptance of persuasion and the inhibition of counterargumentation under various distraction tasks
Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change
Distraction, counterarguing and the internalization of attitude change
Distraction and attitude change
On Measuring Counterarguing
Resistance to Persuasion
Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda
Warning, distraction, and resistance to influence
Facilitating effects of "eating-while-reading" on responsiveness to persuasive communications
Modifying the impact of persuasive communications with external distraction
Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing
Persistence of opinion change induced under conditions of forewarning and distraction
On resistance to persuasive communications
The effectiveness of unanticipated persuasive communications
The relation between distraction and persuasion
An Empirical Test of a Model of Resistance to Persuasion
| Citations per year | 0.42 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1986 - 2021 (36) |
| Highly cited | No |