Commentary
From the state law monopoly to the social theory of collectivities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14800077 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jan-Christoph Marschelke (Forschungsstelle Kultur- und Kollektivwissenschaft, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 275-279 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0732-9113 • E-ISSN: 2305-9931 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07329113.2018.1554367 |
| OpenAlex | W2907143791 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
This commentary argues that legal pluralism research should be in thorough conversation with social theory. Practice theory and theories of network and community seem to be the most interesting candidates for this exchange. In this conversation, however, ethnographic legal studies should be careful not to lose track of the law and of normativity
Conversation · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Legal pluralism · Legal realism · Legal research · Monopoly · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|