Translation and validation of two questionnaires assessing fear of flying for Portuguese language
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14825877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catarina Mestre (corresponding author), Antonio Lopes (0000-0002-9357-7639), Cátia Reis (0000-0001-6585-3993, University of Lisbon), Sara Lemos da Costa, Cristina Albuquerque |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 367-381 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Análise Psicológica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0870-8231 • E-ISSN: 1646-6020 |
| Publisher | ISPA - Instituto Universitario (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14417/ap.1197 |
| OpenAlex | W2753614696 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
The present paper describes the translation process and psychometric properties of the Portuguese versions of two self-report scales for fear of flying assessment: FAS and FAM. Internal consistency and convergent and divergent validities were assessed in a sample of 960 Portuguese speaking population. Results confirmed FAS-PT as a 3 factor model and FAM-PT as a 2 factor model, like the original versions. Cronbach's coefficient showed excellent values for FAS-PT (.99) and FAM-PT (.97). Convergent validity showed a strong correlation in both scales, with r values between .75 and .87. In opposite, divergent validity presented a poor correlation in both scales, with r values between .28 and .38
Biology · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Portuguese · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Computer Science · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Philosophy · Psychology
Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures
A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis
Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
| Highly cited | No |
|---|