Children's understanding of the subjectivity of intentions – Masked by linguistic task demands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14827779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Isa Blomberg (0000-0002-9524-335X, Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, corresponding author), Joana Lonquich (University of Göttingen), Marina Proft (0000-0002-8799-9165, University of Göttingen), Hannes Rakoczy (0000-0003-3296-0551, University of Göttingen) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Pages | 101579 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognitive Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0885-2014 • E-ISSN: 1879-226X |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cogdev.2025.101579 |
| OpenAlex | W4410219215 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
One crucial form of advanced Theory of Mind that is foundational for our everyday social lives is the understanding of the subjective intentionality behind people’s actions. Intentions can be subjective in the following sense: an agent may do many things at once but which of these she does intentionally depends on the description under which she represent these acts (Anscombe, 1979; Searle, 1983). For example, a chef may simultaneously serve an exquisite dinner decorated with nuts, thereby impress the guests, while also triggering an allergic reaction in one guest – and only perform the former two intentionally (serve dinner, impress guests) but not the latter (cause allergic reaction). From a developmental perspective, a crucial question is when such complex action understanding emerges. Previous research indicated that children’s understanding of subjective intentions emerges relatively late (Kamawar & Olson, 2011; Proft et al., 2019; Schünemann, Proft, et al., 2021). The present studies investigated whether these difficulties might have been due to linguistic task demands. We developed a new task that did not require subtle linguistic understanding of complex test questions. Instead, children judged whether some behavior was brought about by an intentional action given an agent’s (false) beliefs and desires. Four-to-seven-year-olds ( N = 246) participated in two preregistered studies. Despite the fact that the tasks were linguistically much simplified, we found comparable results to previous studies: Children proficiently ascribed subjective intentions only from around age five to six years. These results provide converging evidence for a protracted development of advanced Theory of Mind and raise questions, for future research, regarding the foundations of such developmental trajectories
Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Linguistics · Subjectivity · Child and Animal Learning Development · Language Development and Disorders · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason
The ease and extent of recursive mindreading, across implicit and explicit tasks
Rational imitation in preverbal infants
An advanced test of theory of mind
Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions
Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models
Counterfactual Thought
Teleological reasoning in infancy
JsPsych
Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach
Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development
A simple definition of ‘intentionally’
Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models
The trajectory of counterfactual simulation in development
Unwilling Versus Unable
Understanding the intentions of others
The development of children's knowledge about the appearance–reality distinction
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |