Classical Frequentist Statistics
Point
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14856156 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ernest B Hook (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 61-65 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Academic Questions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-4852 • E-ISSN: 1936-4709 |
| Publisher | National Association of Scholars (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.51845/38.2.9 |
| OpenAlex | W4413188115 |
| Language | EN |
The Spring 2025 issue of Academic Questions contained a review by William M. Briggs suggesting that social scientists discard “frequentist” statistics, which in his view has badly degraded the credibility of scientific research. Here, physician and medical researcher Dr. Ernest B. Hook writes to defend frequentist or “classical” statistics, and Mr. Briggs provides a response
Bayesian inference · Bayesian probability · Econometrics · Frequentist inference · Frequentist probability · Higher education · Philosophy of education · Political science · Sociology · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Law · Mathematics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|