Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are Prosumer Households That Much Different? Evidence From Stated Residential Energy Consumption in Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID14866342
AuthorsChristian Oberst (0000-0002-2677-8588, Cologne Institute for Economic Research, corresponding author), Christian A Oberst, Hendrik Schmitz (0000-0002-0253-102X, RWTH Aachen University), Reinhard Madlener (0000-0003-1514-6486, RWTH Aachen University)
Year2019
Volume158
Pages101-115
Publication date2019-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEcological Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-8009 • E-ISSN: 1873-6106
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.014
OpenAlexW2792589942
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited23

Business · Economics · Energy conservation · Energy consumption · Environmental economics · Market economy · Microeconomics · Operations management · Prosumer · Public economics · Purchasing · Renewable energy · Subsidy · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Energy Efficiency and Management · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Engineering

  • Empirical case study of a digitally enabled energy community with prosumers and P2P trading

    Open Access•Philipp Staudt, Bent Richter•Energy Sustainability and Society•2025

  • The ripple effects of residential solar PV from households to the environment and power system

    Open Access•Jingwen Wu, Fang Wang et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • Becoming a building suitable for participation in peer-to-peer energy trading

    Open Access•Bo Rang Park, Min Hee Chung et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2022

  • Understanding the rebound

    C Horne, E Huddart Kennedy•Environmental Sociology•2021

  • I'll follow the sun

    Open Access•Rachel Galvin•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • A health research interdisciplinary approach for energy studies

    Open Access•Rachel Galvin, Johannes Schuler et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Visual observation or oral communication? The effect of social learning on solar photovoltaic adoption intention in rural China

    Open Access•Diyi Liu, Suntong Qi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Does renewable electricity hurt the poor? Exploring levy programs to reduce income inequality and energy poverty across German households

    Open Access•Jan Priesmann, Saskia Spiegelburg et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • The dynamics of solar prosuming

    Open Access•Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg, Hanne Sæle et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Measuring the rebound effect

    Open Access•Jae D Kim, William Trevena•Utilities Policy•2021

  • Impact of governance on resilience in the energy transition. An analysis of China and Germany

    Open Access•Wei Ye, Warathida Chaiyapa•Utilities Policy•2024

  • The Grounded Survey – An integrative mixed method for scrutinizing household energy behavior

    Open Access•MARIA CSUTORA, Ágnes Zsóka et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Characterizing the Danish energy prosumer

    Open Access•Anders Rhiger Hansen, Mette Hove Jacobsen et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • Selling the sun

    Open Access•Martina Kratschmann, Elisabeth Dütschke•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Solar collective self-consumption

    Open Access•Idiano D’adamo, Idiano D'Adamo et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign

    Verena Tiefenbeck, Thorsten Staake et al.•Energy Policy•2013

  • Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Smith, Petra E Todd et al.•Journal of Econometrics•2005

  • Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator

    James J Heckman, Hidehiko Ichimura et al.•The Review of Economic Studies•1998

  • Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching

    Open Access•Marco Caliendo, Sabine Kopeinig•Journal of Economic Surveys•2008

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator

    James J Heckman, Hidehiko Ichimura et al.•The Review of Economic Studies•1997

  • Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies

    Rajeev Dehejia, Rajeev H Dehejia et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2002

  • An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s

    Barbara Sianesi•The Review of Economics and…•2004

  • Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity

    Guido W Imbens•The Review of Economics and…•2004

  • The rebound effect

    Open Access•Steve Sorrell, John Dimitropoulos•Ecological Economics•2008

  • Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation

    Guido W Imbens, Jeffrey M Wooldridge•Journal of Economic Literature•2009

  • Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups

    Open Access•Richard Williams•Sociological Methods & Research•2009

Unique citing works15
Citations per year2.5
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae