Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reason, reasoning, and the taking condition

Bibliographic Data

ID14949484
AuthorsHamid Vahid (0000-0001-9064-0877, School of Analytic Philosophy Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) Tehran Iran, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue1
Pages123-133
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ejop.12917
OpenAlexW4390746120
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

Theoretical reasoning (inference) is a conscious personal‐level activity and a causal process. It is the process of revising one's beliefs for a reason whereby some of our beliefs cause or result in other beliefs. But inference is more than mere causation. This raises the question of what exactly distinguishes theoretical reasoning from mere causal processes. Paul Boghossian has located the distinguishing feature of inference in, what he calls, the “taking condition” requirement (TC). It turns out, however, that all attempts to explain this notion fail. In this paper, I shall offer an indirect argument for the taking condition grounded in a specific account of the structure of epistemic reasons that distinguishes two levels of epistemic normativity, namely, the possession and justification levels. I show how such an account can legitimize the role of (TC) in reasoning and deflect the standard objections raised against it. Finally, I explain how this proposal naturally accommodates the defeasibility of reasoning

Analytic reasoning · Causal inference · Causal reasoning · Causation · Cognition · Deductive reasoning · Defeasible estate · Defeasible reasoning · Epistemology · Inference · Philosophy of science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology

  • Rationality and Possessing Normative Reasons

    Open Access•Mohamad Hadi Safaei•Erkenntnis•2025

  • The Importance of Being Rational

    Errol Lord•Importance of Being Rational•2018

  • Having reasons

    Open Access•Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Studies•2008

  • How to speak of the colors

    Open Access•Mark Johnston•Philosophical Studies•1992

  • What is inference?

    Open Access•Paul Boghossian•Philosophical Studies•2014

  • I — Paul Boghossian

    Open Access•Paul Boghossian•Aristotelian Society Supplementary…•2003

  • What the Tortoise Said to Achilles

    Lewis Carroll•Mind•1895

  • What reasoning might be

    Open Access•Markos Valaris•Synthese•2017

  • Normativity in Reasoning

    Open Access•John Broome•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2014

  • Kinds of Reasons

    Maria Alvarez, Maria Ph D Alvarez•Kinds of reasons•2010

  • Dispositions and Conditionals

    C B Martins, C B Martin•The Philosophical Quarterly•1994

  • Dispositions and Antidotes

    Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•The Philosophical Quarterly•1998

  • Finkish Dispositions

    David Lewis•The Philosophical Quarterly•1997

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae