Does the NEA Need Saving
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14998656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Wilbur (Sarah Wilbur is a choreographer, dance and performance researcher, and the Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in dance studies at Brown University. She writes about infrastructure and embodiment. Her recent research appears in TDR, Performance Research, and the Journal of Emerging Dance Scholarship. Forthcoming are essays in The Oxford Handbook on Dance and Competition and the Mellon Futures of Dance Studies collection. Her current book project analyzes institution building though a dance lens, using as its..., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 96-106 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | TDR/The Drama Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1054-2043 • E-ISSN: 1531-4715 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/dram_a_00694 |
| OpenAlex | W2770203738 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
What are the stakes in saving the NEA, today? Departing from the recent legislative back-and-forth between President Donald Trump and Congress over the budgetary future of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), this performance analysis of the NEA’s 31 March 2017 meeting of the National Council on the Arts reveals the complex political posturing that undergirds federal support for the arts in US culture
Endowment · Legislature · Political science · Politics · The arts · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Law · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |