Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Identification of Advantages and Deficiencies of Current Digital Health Science Popularization in China

A Qualitative Study in Yangtze River Delta Region

Bibliographic Data

ID15087131
AuthorsYuhui Ruan (0000-0002-2583-4306, Soochow University), Dongfang Wang (0000-0001-8112-3149, Tongji University, corresponding author), Yue Wu (0000-0002-3051-6361, Soochow University)
EditorsMücahit Aydın (0000-0002-4934-0191), Mucahit Aydin
Year2023
Volume2023
Pages1-13
Publication date2023-10-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1155/2023/5573969
OpenAlexW4387613881
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited47

Background. Health science popularization, especially digital health science popularization, is essential for development of the Healthy China Strategy. Current studies have focused on interpreting digital education popularization and confirming its positive function; however, reports regarding the limitations and shortcomings thereof are lacking. We aimed to research the current development of digital health science popularization in China, analyze the existing problems, and explore the methods to resolve these problems. Methods. We conducted a qualitative study by mixing in-depth interviews and grounded theory approaches. Participants were recruited according to the inclusion criteria via a snowballing process. Thirty-nine participants, including doctors, nurses, researchers, officers in government, and project leaders, were recruited from the Yangtze River Delta region. Online in-depth interviews with open questions were conducted, and the data were collected. Results. Our results revealed that digital health science popularization has the advantages of convenience, swiftness, friendliness, and social links. However, obvious deficiencies were also exposed, including low authenticity, limited audiences, a lack of manpower, and fragmentation. Conclusions. Current digital health science popularization needs to emphasize public welfare, promote the dissemination of information with professionalism and authority, cultivate cross-border talent, and develop institutional infrastructure to overcome the deficiencies thereof. This remains important to improve the quality and effectiveness of digital health science popularization

China · Government (linguistics) · Grounded theory · Health science · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Media Influence and Health · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology

  • The impact of demographic characteristics on health literacy in the population

    Open Access•Rui Li, Xinyu Xu et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement

    Open Access•Anthony Dudo, John C Besley et al.•PLoS ONE•2016

  • The Digital Divide Among Low-Income Homebound Older Adults

    Open Access•Namkee G Choi, Diana M Dinitto•Journal of Medical Internet…•2013

  • Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health

    Simon Szreter•International Journal of…•2004

  • Communication Mechanisms and Implications of the Covid-19 Risk Event in Chinese Online Communities

    Open Access•Peng-Peng Li, Li Pengpeng et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Why Do Patients Seek Diagnose Dis-accordance With Hierarchical Medical System Related Policies in Tertiary Hospitals? A Qualitative Study in Shanghai From the Perspective of Physicians

    Open Access•Yuhui Ruan, Jin Luo et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Factual accuracy and the cultural context of science in popular media

    Open Access•Evan Szu, Jonathan Osborne et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Unbalanced progress

    Open Access•Hepeng Jia, Li Liu•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Information visualisation as a resource for popularising the technical-biomedical aspects of the last Ebola virus epidemic

    Open Access•Miguel Alcíbar•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • More engagement but less participation

    Open Access•Hepeng Jia•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • Mapping science communication scholarship in China

    Open Access•Linjia Xu, Biaowen Huang et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Effective approaches to public engagement with global health topics

    Open Access•Iain H Campbell, Igor Rudan•Journal of Global Health•2020

  • Internet use and need for digital health technology among the elderly

    Open Access•Xinran Sun, Wenxin Yan et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Have you wondered why sportspeople die?’ The medical weblog as a popularisation tool

    Open Access•Małgorzata Sokół•Discourse Context & Media•2018

  • Who are Volunteers in Urban China

    Open Access•Fengqin Liu, Xiulan Zhang•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2020

  • Watch Out

    Lisa Scharrer, Vanessa Pape et al.•Discourse Processes•2022

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Knowledge communication and knowledge dissemination in a digital world

    Open Access•Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • You don't trust a government vaccine

    Open Access•Amelia M Jamison, Sandra C Quinn et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Sanitation-related psychosocial stress

    Open Access•Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Kristyna R S Hulland et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews

    Open Access•Nicole M Deterding, Mary C Waters•Sociological Methods & Research•2021

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae