Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The impact of human interviewers versus AI interviewers on applicant self‐efficacy and offer acceptance

Bibliographic Data

ID15087609
AuthorsMin Cui (0000-0001-7896-2822, Business School University of International Business and Economics Beijing China), Zhengqiao Chen (0009-0007-9832-4140, Business School University of International Business and Economics Beijing China, corresponding author), Mingpeng Huang (0000-0003-2295-8247, Business School University of International Business and Economics Beijing China)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue2
Publication date2025-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Journal Of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1367-2223 • E-ISSN: 1467-839X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajsp.70009
OpenAlexW4408661131
LanguageEN
References cited50

AI‐based recruitment interviews are increasingly prevalent in many companies. However, our understanding of AI interviews remains limited. Drawing upon social information processing theory, we propose that, compared to successfully passing a human interview, passing an AI interview may reduce applicants' self‐efficacy while decreasing their likelihood of accepting a job offer. Moreover, we propose the relationship is stronger for female applicants (vs male applicants). Results from an experiment supported our hypotheses. Our findings offer some important theoretical and practical implications

AI and HR Technologies · Employer Branding and e-HRM · Human Resource and Talent Management · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Discriminated by an algorithm

    Open Access•Alina Köchling, Marius Claus Wehner•Business Research•2020

  • Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables

    Open Access•Gordon W Cheung, Rebecca S Lau•Organizational Research Methods•2008

  • The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems

    Stephen W Gilliland•Academy of Management Review•1993

  • Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

    Alice H Eagly, Steven J Karau•Psychological Review•2002

  • Disability, fairness, and algorithmic bias in AI recruitment

    Open Access•Nicholas Tilmes•Ethics and Information Technology•2022

  • Repelled at first sight? Expectations and intentions of job-seekers reading about AI selection in job advertisements

    Open Access•Jenny S Wesche, A Sonderegger•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures

    Open Access•Maude Lavanchy, Patrick Reichert et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection

    Open Access•Anna Lena Hunkenschroer, Christoph Luetge•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Social Role Theory

    Alice H Eagly, Wendy Wood•Handbook of theories of social…•2012

  • The Social Psychology of Self-Efficacy

    Viktor Gecas•Annual Review of Sociology•1989

  • Self-efficacy

    Albert Bandura•Psychological Review•1977

  • Unlocking and closing the gender gap in creative performance

    Open Access•Snehal Hora, G James Lemoine et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2021

  • Rolling with the Changes

    Open Access•Amanda B Diekman, Wind Goodfriend•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2006

  • Examining perceptions towards hiring algorithms

    Open Access•Lixuan Zhang, Christopher Yencha•Technology in Society•2022

  • No Thanks, Dear AI! Understanding the Effects of Disclosure and Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Public Sector Recruitment

    Open Access•Florian Keppeler•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men

    Alice H Eagly, Mary E Kite•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae