Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Linoleic acid and breast cancer risk

A meta-analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID15090516
AuthorsYunping Zhou (0000-0001-6132-7590), Tao Wang (0000-0002-8367-8946), Shenyong Zhai, Wei Li (0000-0002-3581-849X), Qiang Meng (0000-0003-4507-8947)
Year2016
Volume19
Issue8
Pages1457-1463
Publication date2016-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s136898001500289x
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

Objective Prior studies on linoleic acid, the predominant n -6 fatty acid, and breast cancer risk have generated inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the relationship of dietary and serum linoleic acid with breast cancer risk. Design Pertinent studies were identified by a search of PubMed and EMBASE. The fixed- or random-effect pooled measure was selected based on between-study heterogeneity. Results Eight prospective cohort studies and four prospective nested case–control studies, involving 10 410 breast cancer events from 358 955 adult females across different countries, were included in present study. Compared with the lowest level of linoleic acid, the pooled relative risk (RR; 95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·98 (0·93, 1·04) for the highest level of linoleic acid. The pooled RR (95 % CI) for dietary and serum linoleic acid were 0·99 (0·92, 1·06) and 0·98 (0·88, 1·08), respectively. The RR (95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·97 (0·91, 1·04), 0·95 (0·85, 1·07), 0·96 (0·86, 1·07), 0·98 (0·87, 1·10) and 0·99 (0·85, 1·14) for linoleic acid intake of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 g/d, respectively. The risk of breast cancer decreased by 1 % (RR=0·99; 95 % CI 0·93, 1·05) for every 10 g/d increment in linoleic acid intake. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated that both dietary linoleic acid intake and serum linoleic acid level were associated with decreased risk of breast cancer, although none of the associations were statistically significant. Further investigations are warranted

  • Comparative study on the pharmacodynamic difference of oral administration of Xiaojin Pills accompanied with Chinese Baijiu and water

    Open Access•Jiao Song, Bi Feng et al.•Journal of Ethnopharmacology•2021

  • Dose‐response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research

    Open Access•Loic Desquilbet, François Mariotti•Statistics in Medicine•2010

  • Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    Open Access•Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson et al.•BMJ•2003

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae