Legume consumption and its association with fasting glucose, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in the Indian Migration Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15092118 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Preet K Dhillon (0000-0002-0291-9454, Public Health Foundation of India, corresponding author), Liza Bowen (0000-0001-8318-8421, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Sanjay Kinra (0000-0001-6690-4625, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Ankalmadugu Venkatsubbareddy Bharathi, A Bharathi, Sutapa Agrawal (0000-0001-8088-2143, Public Health Foundation of India), Dorairaj Prabhakaran (0000-0002-3172-834X, Public Health Foundation of India), K Srinath Reddy (0000-0003-3416-3548, Public Health Foundation of India), Shah Ebrahim (0000-0001-9438-1438, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 16 |
| Pages | 3017-3026 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980016001233 |
| PMID | 27329792 |
| OpenAlex | W2467146708 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 62 |
Objective Legume consumption is associated with lower fasting glucose (FG) and insulin levels in nutrition trials and lower CVD mortality in large-scale epidemiological studies. In India, legumes are widely consumed in various preparations, yet no epidemiological study has evaluated the association of legumes with FG levels, insulin resistance and diabetes risk. The present study aimed to fill this gap. Design Fasting blood samples, in-person interviews to obtain information on demographic/socio-economic factors, physical activity, alcohol and tobacco use, and anthropometric measurements were collected. Dietary intakes were assessed by an interviewer-administered, validated, semi-quantitative FFQ. Setting Lucknow, Nagpur, Hyderabad and Bangalore, India. Subjects Men and women ( n 6367) aged 15–76 years – urban residents, urban migrants and their rural siblings. Results In multivariate random-effects models adjusted for age, BMI, total energy intake, macronutrients, physical activity and rural/migration status, daily legume consumption was not associated with FG ( P -for-trend=0·78), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment score; P -for-trend=0·73) or the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus ( P -for-trend=0·41). Stratified analyses by vegetarian diet and migration status did not change the findings. Inverse associations between legumes and FG emerged for participants with lower BMI and higher carbohydrate, protein, fat and sugar intakes. Conclusions Although legumes are essential in traditional Indian diets, as well as in prudent and Mediterranean diets in the West, we did not find an association between legumes and markers of glycaemic control, insulin resistance or diabetes, except for subgroups based on BMI and macronutrient intake. The ubiquitous presence and complexity of legume preparations in Indian diets may contribute to these findings
Agronomy · Association (psychology · Biology · Consumption (sociology · Diabetes mellitus · Fasting glucose · Insulin · Insulin resistance · Legume · Sociology · Type 2 diabetes · Medicine · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Phytoestrogen effects and research · Psychology · Endocrinology · Internal Medicine
Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1
Alternative Dietary Indices Both Strongly Predict Risk of Chronic Disease
The Effect of Rural-to-Urban Migration on Obesity and Diabetes in India
Association between legume intake and self-reported diabetes among adult men and women in India
Assessment of physical activity using accelerometry, an activity diary, the heart rate method and the Indian Migration Study questionnaire in South Indian adults
The Mortality Divide in India
Reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |