Have socio-economic inequalities in sugar purchasing widened? A longitudinal analysis of food and beverage consumer data from British households, 2014–2017
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15092192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | N Berger (0000-0002-4213-6040, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, corresponding author), Steven Cummin (0000-0002-3957-4357, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Steven Cummins, R Smith (0000-0003-3837-6559, University of Exeter), Richard D Smith (0000-0002-4553-5426), Laura Cornelsen (0000-0003-3769-8740, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1583-1594 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980020005029 |
| PMID | 33317656 |
| OpenAlex | W3113282827 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 24 |
Objective: To examine socio-economic inequalities in decreases in household sugar purchasing in Great Britain (GB). Design: Longitudinal, population-based study. Setting: Data were obtained from the GB Kantar Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) panel (2014–2017), a nationally representative panel study of food and beverages bought and brought into the home. We estimated changes in daily sugar purchases by occupational social grade from twenty-three food groups, using generalised estimating equations (household-level clustering). Participants: British households who regularly reported food and beverages to the GB Kantar FMCG ( n 28 033). Results: We found that lower social grades obtained a lower proportion of sugar from healthier foods and a greater proportion of sugar from less healthy foods and beverages. In 2014, differences in daily sugar purchased between the lowest and the highest social grades were 3·9 g/capita/d (95 % CI 2·9, 4·8) for table sugar, 2·4 g (95 % CI 1·8, 3·1) for sugar-sweetened beverages, 2·2 g (95 % CI 1·5, 2·8) for chocolate and confectionery and 1·0 g (95 % CI 0·7, 1·3) for biscuits. Conversely, the lowest social grade purchased less sugar from fruits (2·1 g (95 % CI 1·5, 2·8)) and vegetables (0·7 g (95 % CI 0·5, 0·8)) than the highest social grade. We found little evidence of change in social grade differences between 2014 and 2017. These results suggest that recent overall declines in sugar purchases are largely equally distributed across socio-economic groups. Conclusions: This suggests that recent population-level policy activity to reduce sugar consumption in GB does not appear to exacerbate or reduce existing socio-economic inequalities in sugar purchasing. Low agency, population-level policies may be the best solution to improving population diet without increasing inequalities
Added sugar · Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Panel data · Per capita · Population · Purchasing · Sociology · Sugar · Demography · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Obesity and Health Practices · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Food Science · Marketing
Applied Longitudinal Analysis
Does social class predict diet quality?
Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake
Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency
Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact
Is the objective food environment associated with perceptions of the food environment
Trends in socio-economic inequalities in the Scottish diet
What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews
Socioeconomic differences in purchases of more vs. less healthy foods and beverages
Socio-economic patterning of expenditures on 'out-of-home' food and non-alcoholic beverages by product and place of purchase in Britain
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |