Characterizing energy intake misreporting and its effects on intake estimations, in the Portuguese adult population
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15095463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vânia Magalhães (0000-0002-6521-980X, Universidade do Porto), Mílton Severo (0000-0002-5787-4871, Universidade do Porto), David Torres (0000-0001-8960-2160, Universidade do Porto), Duarte Torres, Elisabete Ramos (0000-0001-6573-218X, Universidade do Porto), Carla Lopes (0000-0003-1524-852X, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1031-1040 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980019002465 |
| PMID | 31564257 |
| OpenAlex | W2978521865 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate energy intake misreporting prevalence, its associated factors and its effects on nutrient intake, in the Portuguese population aged from 18 to 84 years. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Portugal. Subjects: Adults participants from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey, IAN-AF, 2015–2016, who provided two complete 24 h dietary recall and complete covariate information. Results: Under, plausible and over-reporters were identified according to the Goldberg method. Total misreporting prevalence was 29·9 %, being 28·5 % of under-reporting and 1·4 % of over-reporting. The current study found higher odds of being classified as an under-reporter especially in participants with higher BMI and in those who self-reported health perception status as non-favourable. Energy intake estimation increases by 853.5 kJ/d (204 kcal/d) when misreporters are excluded, and the same tendency is observed for macro and micronutrients. It is worth mentioning that the prevalence of inadequacy for protein intake decreases by about 5 % when considering plausible reporters. Conclusions: The exclusion of misreporters has a small impact on the crude energy and nutrient estimates as well as on assessing the contribution of nutrients to total energy intake. However, a moderate impact was observed in the estimation of nutrient inadequacy prevalence
Biology · Cross-sectional study · Energy (signal processing · Environmental health · Estimation · Logistic regression · Micronutrient · National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey · Nutrient · Odds · Odds ratio · Population · Portuguese · Statistics · Demography · Diet and metabolism studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Gerontology · Internal Medicine
New Effect Size Rules of Thumb
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Nutritional Epidemiology
Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data
Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice
Using Intake Biomarkers to Evaluate the Extent of Dietary Misreporting in a Large Sample of Adults
Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake
Under- and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample
Markers of the Validity of Reported Energy Intake
An overview of Usda's Dietary Intake Data System
Sociodemographic, lifestyle, mental health and dietary factors associated with direction of misreporting of energy intake
Measuring food intake in studies of obesity
BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |