Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comparison of the nutritional quality of organic and conventional ready-to-eat breakfast cereals based on NuVal scores

Bibliographic Data

ID15096097
AuthorsNancy J Woodbury (Florida International University, corresponding author), Valérie George (Florida International University), Valerie A George
Year2014
Volume17
Issue7
Pages1454-1458
Publication date2014-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980013001456
PMID23714263
OpenAlexW2118257786
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited14

Objective To identify whether there were differences in nutritional quality between organic and conventional ready-to-eat breakfast cereals of similar types, based on NuVal scores. Design The current descriptive study analysed NuVal scores for 829 ready-to-eat breakfast cereals and eighteen different cereal types. ANOVA was used to compare the mean NuVal scores of 723 conventional cereals with those of 106 organic cereals. Setting Ready-to-eat breakfast cereals ( n 829) with NuVal scores. Subjects Not applicable. Results There was no significant difference in NuVal scores between conventional (mean 28·4 ( sd 13·4)) and organic (mean 30·6 ( sd 13·2)) cereal types. Conclusions Consumers who choose the organic version of a ready-to-eat breakfast cereal believing that nutritional quality is superior may not be making a valid assumption. Public health nutrition educators must help consumers understand that organic cereals are not necessarily more nutritious and their consumption could result in excessive intake of undesirable nutrients, such as fat, sugar and sodium

Biology · Breakfast cereal · Environmental health · Nutrient · Significant difference · Statistics · Sugar · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Mathematics · Medicine · Organic Food and Agriculture · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Biotechnology · Food Science · Toxicology

  • Evaluating “natural” and “healthy” food labels

    Christoph Bauner, Nathalie Lavoie•British Food Journal•2026

  • Evaluation of breakfast cereals with the current nutrition facts panel (NFP) and the Food and Drug Administration’s NFP proposal

    Open Access•Claudia González-Vallejo, Claudia González‐Vallejo et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2016

  • Patient Understanding of Food Labels

    Open Access•Russell L Rothman, Ryan Housam et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2006

  • Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour

    Open Access•Maria K Magnusson, Anne Arvola et al.•Appetite•2003

  • Nutritional quality of Australian breakfast cereals. Are they improving

    Open Access•Jimmy Chun Yu Louie, Elizabeth K Dunford et al.•Appetite•2012

  • Lifestyle segmentation of US food shoppers to examine organic and local food consumption

    Open Access•Cong Nie, Lydia Zepeda•Appetite•2011

  • Consumers’ purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices

    Open Access•Ulf Hjelmar•Appetite•2011

  • Nutrient profiling and the regulation of marketing to children. Possibilities and pitfalls

    Open Access•Mike Rayner, Patricia Scarborough et al.•Appetite•2013

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae