Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Controlled trials of vitamin D, causality and type 2 statistical error

Bibliographic Data

ID15097500
AuthorsOIiver Gillie (UK Health Forum, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume19
Issue3
Pages409-414
Publication date2016-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980014002304
PMID25370294
OpenAlexW1987200434
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited39

Two recent studies published in The Lancet (Autier et al. (2013) Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2 , 76–89 and Bolland et al. (2014) Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2 , 307–320) have concluded that low levels of vitamin D are not a cause but a consequence of ill health brought about by reduced exposure to the sun, an association known as ‘reverse causality’. The scientific evidence and reasoning for these conclusions are examined here and found to be faulty. A null result in a clinical trial of vitamin D in adults need not lead to a conclusion of reverse causation when low vitamin D is found in observational studies of the same disease earlier in life. To assume an explanation of reverse causality has close similarities with type 2 statistical error. For example, a null result in providing vitamin D for treatment of adult bones that are deformed in the pattern of the rachitic rosary would not alter the observation that lack of vitamin D can cause rickets in childhood and may have lasting consequences if not cured with vitamin D. Other examples of diseases considered on a lifetime basis from conception to adulthood are used to further illustrate the issue, which is evidently not obvious and is far from trivial. It is concluded that deficiency of vitamin D in cohort studies, especially at critical times such as pregnancy and early life, can be the cause of a number of important diseases. Denial of the possible benefits of vitamin D, as suggested by insistent interpretation of studies with reverse causation, may lead to serious harms, some of which are listed

Biology · Causation · Cohort · Denial · Diabetes mellitus · Disease · Econometrics · Epistemology · Null hypothesis · Observational study · Physics · Pregnancy · Rickets · Vitamin · Vitamin D and neurology · vitamin D deficiency · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Mathematics · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Philosophy · Psychology · Vitamin D Research Studies · Endocrinology · Internal Medicine · Pediatrics · Physiology

  • On the pitfalls of disclosure statements

    Open Access•Marilyn Tseng, Allison Hodge et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2016

  • Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency

    Open Access•Michael F Holick, Neil Binkley et al.•The Journal of Clinical…•2011

  • Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets

    Open Access•Michael F Holick•Journal of Clinical Investigation•2006

  • Distribution of Paget's disease in England, Wales and Scotland and a possible relationship with vitamin D deficiency in childhood

    D J P Barker, D J Barker et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1974

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,1
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae