Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do You See What I Hear?”

Designing for Collocated Patient–Practitioner Collaboration in Audiological Consultations

Bibliographic Data

ID15215915
AuthorsYngve Dahl (0000-0002-5524-4278, SINTEF Digital, corresponding author), Geir Kjetil Hanssen (0000-0003-2718-6637, SINTEF Digital)
Year2017
Volume33
Issue5-6
Pages372-421
Publication date2017-09-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman-Computer Interaction (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0737-0024 • E-ISSN: 1532-7051
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07370024.2017.1374184
OpenAlexW2755808195
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited37

Patient-centered care encourages active involvement of patients in their own treatment and a collaborative perspective on the relationship between patient and practitioner. However, to achieve constructive patient–practitioner collaboration in medical consultations the partakers need to successfully interact across conceptual boundaries that can impede intersubjectivity, i.e., the construction of shared meanings and understandings in communicative activities. We present a synthesis of a user-centered approach to designing interactive technology supporting collaboration in face-to-face consultations related to audiological (hearing) rehabilitation. Specifically, we focus on the case of hearing aid tuning, and on the design and utility assessment of a prototype sound environment simulator intended to support the process by helping the patient and the practitioner build a joint understanding of the individual patient’s hearing problem and perceived effects of treatment actions. We describe an empirical and qualitative investigation that calls specific attention to the multi-dimensional boundaries involved in collocated patient–practitioner interactions, and to the explorative and situated nature of the consultation as a collaborative problem-solving process. Here, various micro-practices play a key role in gradually forming a better understanding of the problem at hand and in identifying appropriate treatment steps. Our findings suggest that patient–practitioner collaboration can benefit from interactive technology, which is sufficiently flexible or open-ended in terms of use to accommodate, or be appropriated, to the immediate needs of the situation. We argue that designing technology with the aim of enhancing existing practices of intersubjectivity, rather than doing away with them, improves the chances of enriching collocated patient–practitioner interaction and reduces risk of obstructing it. The main research contribution is an increased understanding of the medical consultation as an instance of collocated collaborative work and learning, and the challenges and opportunities that lie in co-designing interactive solutions that can help the patient take an active and contributing part in the situation

Constructive · Health care · Intersubjectivity · Knowledge management · Medical education · Patient participation · Perspective (graphical · Process (computing · Situated · Sociology · Action Observation and Synchronization · Computer Science · Design Education and Practice · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Medicine · Psychology

  • Representative Participation in a Large-Scale Health IT Project

    Open Access•Øivind Klungseth Zahlsen, Dag Svanæs et al.•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2023

  • Doing Conversation Analysis

    Paul Ten Have•Doing Conversation Analysis•2007

  • Groupware

    Open Access•Clarence A Ellis, Simon Gibbs et al.•Communications of the ACM•1991

  • Grounding in communication.

    Herbert H Clark, Susan E Brennan•Perspectives on socially shared…•1991

  • Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care

    Michael J Barry, Susan Edgman-Levitan et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2012

  • The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care

    Open Access•Ronald M Epstein, Richard L Street•The Annals of Family Medicine•2011

  • Designing for Appropriation

    Open Access•Pierre Tchounikine•Human-Computer Interaction•2016

  • From Intersubjectivity to Group Cognition

    Open Access•Gerry Stahl•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2016

  • Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects

    Open Access•Susan Leigh Star, James Griesemer et al.•Social Studies of Science•1989

  • Engendering Response

    Open Access•Helena Webb, C Heath et al.•Symbolic Interaction•2013

  • Patient Participation in Medical Consultations

    Richard L Street, H Scott Gordon et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae