Protection of Refugees and Displaced Persons in the Asia Pacific Region
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15293079 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Shearer (University of South Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 724-727 |
| Publication date | 2014-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Refugee Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8186 • E-ISSN: 1464-3715 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ijrl/eeu059 |
| OpenAlex | W1980475992 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
The thirteen chapters collected in this volume engage with the experience and varying policies of states in the Asia Pacific region regarding refugees, asylum seekers, displaced persons, and ‘environmental refugees’. The stated aim of the editors is that the contributors to the volume should ‘take stock of regional and global developments and explore the historical and political environment for the reception of protection norms’ in the region. Two principal facts colour the background to the studies. First, according to UNHCR figures (2011), the Asia Pacific region hosted the highest number of refugees (3,793,900) of any region in the world. The second is that the number of parties to the CSR51 and the CSRP67 in the region is low. In Southeast Asia, only Cambodia and the Philippines are parties; the main recipient and transit countries of refugees and asylum seekers in that sub-region, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand, are non-parties. A third fact is recognised in many of the studies. Australia, as the largest developed country in the region, is the preferred destination of many asylum seekers. Australia is a party to the CSR51 and the CSRP67. However, protected through the absence of land borders with any of its neighbours, it has shown increasing reluctance to accept asylum seekers arriving by boat and otherwise than through its established refugee resettlement and immigration programmes. Few asylum seekers arrive in Australia by boat directly from countries where they have endured persecution; most come by way of ‘secondary movements’ from countries where they have been accorded temporary protection. However, seeing no permanent future in those countries, and frustrated by the slowness of resettlement programmes, they have taken to boats organised by paid people smugglers. Harsh measures against unauthorised boat arrivals have been taken by successive Australian governments. They enjoy wide popular support in Australia. Those measures include removing asylum seekers for processing in other countries (Papua New Guinea and Nauru) and the denial of resettlement in Australia
Comprehensive Plan of Action · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Immigration · Persecution · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Law
A comprehensive review of refugee and asylum studies in contemporary Hong Kong
The Plight of Boat Refugees to Thailand
Linguistic hostility, social exclusion, and the agency of African migrants in Hong Kong
Just Around the Corner
Refugee Registration Schemes in Malaysia
Criminalizing the innocents
Neutral’ Representations of Pacific Islands in the IPCC Special Report of 1.5°C Global Warming
Active in Not Being Active (Ainba)
Between refugee protection and migration management
Japan and international refugee protection norms
| Citations per year | 0.91 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |