Entangled evidence
Epistemic injustice, and systemic neglect in the assessment of menstrual disorders following Covid-19 vaccines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15294271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maurizia Mezza (0000-0001-5752-9755, Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09581596.2024.2446763 |
| OpenAlex | W4406622311 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 28 |
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacovigilance activities detected and assessed symptoms, such as rare blood clotting disorders, myocarditis, and erythema multiforme, potentially linked to some adenovirus-based and mRNA-based vaccines. While some presumed side effects were swiftly assessed, others, such as menstrual disorders following mRNA vaccination, were subjected to prolonged debates. This paper explores the EMA’s assessment process of menstrual disorders, which initially resisted but eventually acknowledged a possible connection between Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty (also known as Pfizer). Through an analysis of the PRAC evaluation process, I suggest that epistemic injustice and the systemic neglect of menstruation contributed to the challenges in this assessment. This paper emphasizes that structural bias in healthcare, health research, and policy accumulates at different stages of pharmacovigilance, shaping the evidence about vaccine safety. Although vaccines are generally safe, they may, in fact, be safer – or at least known to be safer – for some groups. To address these issues, a pluralist and transdisciplinary approach to knowledge should play a crucial role, questioning how evidence is produced and acknowledging potential intersectional biases
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Epistemology · Infectious disease (medical specialty · Injustice · Neglect · Outbreak · Pathology · Psychiatry · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology · Virology
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies
Evidence based medicine
Epistemic injustice in healthcare
Falling down the rabbit hole? Methodological, conceptual and policy issues in current health inequalities research
Addressing the dearth of critical gender analysis in public health and medical pedagogy
What’s the problem represented to be? A critical analysis of problem representation in news media and public health communication during a hepatitis A outbreak in San Diego, California, USA
Coming to Understand
The medical text
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
The Egg and the Sperm
Illnesses you have to fight to get
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |